SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 1616

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Upgrad Education Private Limited - Appellant
Versus
Intellipaat Software Solutions Private Limited - Respondent
Civil Suit (COMM) No. 132 of 2022
Decided On : 28-02-2022

Advocates appeared:
Jayant Mehta, Advocate, Mohit Goel, Advocate, Manasi Chatpalliwar, Advocate, Sidhant Goel, Advocate, Abhishek Kotnala, Advocate, Deepankar Mishra, Advocate, Karmanya Dev Sharma, Advocate, P.D.V. Srikar, Advocate

The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of Section 12a of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, particularly in relation to suits seeking injunction, damages, and other reliefs, and the importance of mediation in cases of mutual liabilities.

Headnote:

Section 12a - Commercial Courts Act, 2015 - [Section 12a] - The court discussed the applicability of Section 12a of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 to various categories of proceedings filed before the IPD. It emphasized that the provision would be applicable to suits seeking injunction, damages, and other reliefs, and not to other categories. The court also highlighted that in cases where urgent interim relief is sought, leave would be presumed in view of the language of Section 12a. The judgment also referenced a previous case where the court dismissed an application for exemption under Section 12a, emphasizing the need for mediation in cases of mutual liabilities.

Fact of the Case:

The Plaintiff filed an application seeking exemption from entering into pre-institution mediation and settlement with the Defendant under Section 12a of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The court discussed the applicability of Section 12a to different categories of proceedings filed before the IPD and emphasized the need for mediation in cases of mutual liabilities.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that in suits seeking permanent injunctions and cases where urgent interim relief is sought, leave would be presumed in view of the language of Section 12a. It also emphasized the importance of mediation in cases of mutual liabilities.

Issues: The issues revolved around the applicability of Section 12a of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 to different categories of proceedings filed before the IPD and the need for mediation in cases of mutual liabilities.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the interpretation of Section 12a and its application to suits seeking injunction, damages, and other reliefs. The court also considered the importance of mediation in cases of mutual liabilities.

Final Decision: The court allowed the application for exemption and disposed of the related applications. It also directed that in suits filed before the IPD, where applications for interim injunction are filed and urgent interim relief is sought, leave would be presumed in view of the language of Section 12a.

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. - I.a.3298/2022 (u/S 12a)

1. This is an application filed by the Plaintiff under Section 12a of the Commercial Courts act, 2015 (hereinafter the 'act') seeking exemption from entering into pre-institution mediation and settlement with the Defendant.

2. as per Section 12a of the act, if a suit does not contemplate any urgent interim relief, it cannot be instituted unless the party suing has exhausted the remedy of exploring mediation at the pre-litigation stage.

3. This Court notices that there are various categories of proceedings filed before the IPD which was notified in July of 2021. Such proceedings include -

    a) Suits seeking injunction, damages and other reliefs;

    b) appeals from the orders of various IP Offices;

    c) Original petitions like cancellation petitions, rectification petitions, revocation petitions and other miscellaneous petitions;

    d) Writs, Revisions and other proceedings arising from orders of the IP offices or proceedings before the Commercial Courts.

    4. The provisions of Section 12a would be applicable to category (a) above and not to the other categories. However, in a majority of the suits seeking permanent injunctions, urgent temporary relief is also sought.

    5. Recently in Changsha Sinocare INC v. Rajesh Kumar, [CS (COMM) 27/2022, decided on 14th January 2022], a ld. Single Judge was considering a suit where recovery of money was sought and exemption under Section 12a was sought on the ground that the legal notice issued by the Plaintiff did not evince any positive response from the Defendant. In those facts, the Court observed:

      '6. However, this Court is of the view that it is when there is a difference of opinion regarding mutual liabilities that a dispute arises. In this case, the refusal of the defendant to pay the amount demanded by the plaintiff has resulted in a dispute and in terms of Section 12a of Commercial Courts act, 2015, this dispute had to be first tackled through mediation.

      7. Since no reason has been given for seeking exemption, the application [I.a. 688/2022] is dismissed.'

      6. Thus, the above was a case where on facts the Court was of the opinion that the suit being one for recovery, without availing of the remedy under Section 12a, the suit could not have been filed.

      7. It is thus directed that in suits filed before the IPD, wherein applications for interim injunction are filed and urgent interim relief is sought, such leave would be presumed in view of the language of Section 12a. accordingly, a separate application would not be required where ever urgent interim relief is being sought by the Plaintiff. Moreover, even if urgent interim relief is sought by the Plaintiff but the Court is of the opinion that the parties ought to be relegated to mediation, an order referring the matter to mediation can always be passed.

      8. Ordered accordingly. application is allowed and disposed of.

      I.a.3297/2022 (for exemption)

      9. This is an application seeking exemption from filing Original/ Certified copies of documents, translated copies of documents clearer copies of documents. allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

      10. application is disposed of.

      I.a.3296/2022 (additional documents)

      11. This is an application filed on behalf of the Plaintiff to file additional documents within 30 days. Whatever documents the Plaintiffs wishes to file, let the same be filed within two days.

      12. application is disposed of.

      I.a.3295/2022 (court fee)

      13. This is an application seeking extension of time for filing the court fee. Ld. Counsel submits that the court fees has already been deposited in the treasury. One-week additional time is given to the Plaintiff to deposit the court fee.

      14. application is disposed of.

      CS (COMM) 132/2022

      15. Let the plaint be registered as a suit.

      16. Mr. Nischal anand appears for the Defendant upon advance notice and accepts summons in the suit and notice in all the applications.

      17. The written statement to the plaint shall be positively filed within 30 days from date o

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top