SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back Icon Back Next Next Icon
AI icon Copy icon AI Message Bookmarks icon Share icon Up Arrow icon Down Arrow icon Zoom in icon Zoom Out icon Print Search icon Print icon Download icon Expand icon Close icon
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Sound Icon
judgment-img

HARISH TANDON, PRASENJIT BISWAS, HARISH TANDON, PRASENJIT BISWAS
Odisha Slurry Pipeline Infrastructure Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
IDBI Bank Ltd. – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
(FMAT 360 of 2022)
For the Appellants:Mr. Deepak Khosla, Ms. Anjana Banerjee and Mr. Rohan S. Nandy, Advocates
(FMAT 360 of 2022)
For the Respondent No.39:Mr. Jaydip Kar, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Abhishek Swaroop, Mr. Arkaprava Sen, Mr. Anupam Prakash and Mr. Naman Kamdar, Advocates
(FMAT 360 of 2022)
For the Respondent No.50:Mr. Jishnu Saha, Mr. Dwaipayan Basu Mallick, Mr. Amitabh Shukla and Mr. Ashutosh Shukla, Advocates
(FMAT 314 of 2022)
For the Appellants:Mr. Deepak Khosla, Ms. Anjana Banerjee and Mr. Rahan S. Nandy, Advocates
(FMAT 314 of 2022)
For the Respondent No.1:Mr. Jishnu Saha, Mr. Dwaipayan Basu Mallick and Mr. Ashutosh Shukla, Advocates
(FMAT 314 of 2022)
For the Respondent No.2:Mr. Jaydip Kar, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Abhishek Swaroop, Mr. Arkaprava Sen, Mr. Anupam Prakash and Mr. Naman Kamdar, Advocates
(FMAT 258 of 2022)
For the Appellants:Mr. Suresh Sahni and Mr. Soumik Ghosh, Advocates
(FMAT 258 of 2022)
For the Respondents:Mr. Rupak Ghosh, Ms. Sanjukta Gupta and Ms. Sananda Ganguli, Advocates

Headnote: Read headnote

JUDGMENT

Harish Tandon, J.—The slew of litigations have been percolated in the docket of the Court raising the questions which are common in nature though argued separately by the different set of counsels and were heard in phase manner as the point of law remained common and if decided would impact the decision several such litigations on the factual matrix.

2. The seminal question involved in the aforesaid matters relates to institutions of a suit involving commercial disputes covering the specified value without exhausted the pre litigation mediation contemplated under Section 12 A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 whether or not involving the urgent interim reliefs.

3. The Commercial Courts Act was promulgated in the year 2015 with the avowed object of securing the speedy disposal of the high value commercial disputes through a special forum i.e. by establishing the commercial Courts, Commercial Division and the Commercial Appellate Division of the High Court. At the time of birth of the said Act, there was

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top