Back
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Cfs Netralaya Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Dr. Roop – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Suresh Kumar Kait, J. - The above captioned three petitions have been filed under the provisions of Section 11 of the arbitration and Conciliation act, 1996 seeking appointment of sole arbitrator.
2. Pertinently, parties to these petitions are common and the subject matter of these petitions is also common, therefore, with the consent of learned Senior Counsel for the parties, these petitions have been heard together and are being disposed of vide this common judgment.
3. Learned Senior Counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner in the above captioned petitions [aRB.P. 111/2022 & aRB.P. 112/2022] is a joint venture company between New Delhi Centre for Sight ('NDCFS') and respondent Nos.1 and 2, incorporated under provisions of the Companies act 1956. NDCFS is a company founded by Dr. Mahipal S Sachdev, an eminent ophthalmologist, and Padma Shri awardee, as a leading eye care provider in India.
4. Petitioner in (aRB.P. 203/2022) is a wholly owned subsidiary of New Delhi Centre for Sight ('NDCFS') and is engaged in the business of providing pharma, optical and other related products at the eye care centres owned/run by NDCFS. The said petitioner also provides pharma, optica
The court's decision emphasized the importance of appointing the same arbitrator to hear disputes related to the same composite transaction to avoid conflicting findings.
The court underscores the importance of appointing the same arbitrator for disputes arising from related agreements to avoid conflicting awards.
The court emphasized the importance of compliance with the arbitration and Conciliation act, 1996 and directed the appointment of arbitrators as per the agreement reached by the parties.
The presence of a Dispute Resolution Clause in arbitration agreements necessitates the appointment of arbitrators to resolve disputes, ensuring compliance with statutory requirements.
In the event of the demise of the sole Arbitrator, a new Arbitrator can be appointed to continue the arbitration proceedings in accordance with Sections 14 & 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Ac....
An arbitrator's appointment must adhere to the agreed procedure; failure to do so renders the appointment invalid under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the appointment of an arbitrator must be in accordance with the agreed procedure in the contract. If the appointment is not in line with the a....
The necessity to appoint a new Arbitrator is confirmed under Sections 14 and 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, recognizing the continuation of the arbitration process post-demise of the ori....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
