SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 1370

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, J.
United Telecoms Ltd - Appellant
Versus
Bharat Broadband Network Ltd. - Respondent
Original Miscellaneous Petition (T) (COMM.) No. 23 of 2022, Miscellaneous Application No. 2446 of 2022
Decided On : 14-02-2022

Advocates appeared:
Pawan Upadhyay, Advocate, Gaurav Pathak, Advocate, Rajesh Chettri, Advocate, Chandan N. Kamra, Advocate

The court has the authority to appoint a substituted arbitrator at the joint request of counsel representing both sides, and the appointed arbitrator must ensure compliance with Section 12 of the arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before commencing the arbitration.

Headnote:

arbitration - appointment of sole arbitrator - The court allowed the petition seeking appointment of a substituted arbitrator at the joint request of counsel representing both sides, appointing Mr. Justice (Retd.) Mukul Mudgal as the sole arbitrator and granting the tribunal one year to hear the arguments and render the award.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a petition seeking appointment of a substituted arbitrator as the learned arbitrator expressed inability to hear the arguments in aPO-I due to illness and restraints of the covid pandemic.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the petition and appointed Mr. Justice (Retd.) Mukul Mudgal as the sole arbitrator at the joint request of counsel representing both sides, granting the tribunal one year to hear the arguments and render the award.

Issues: Appointment of substituted arbitrator, advancement of the case, and compliance with Section 12 of the arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Ratio Decidendi: The court can appoint a substituted arbitrator at the joint request of counsel representing both sides, and the appointed arbitrator must ensure compliance with Section 12 of the arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before commencing the arbitration.

Final Decision: The petition seeking appointment of a substituted arbitrator was allowed, and Mr. Justice (Retd.) Mukul Mudgal was appointed as the sole arbitrator with one year granted to hear the arguments and render the award.

JUDGMENT

Suresh Kumar Kait, J. - The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 15(2) of the arbitration and Conciliation act, 1996 seeking appointment of a Sole arbitrator in substitution.

2. For adjudication of the disputes with respondent, this Court by order dated 25.04.2019 [ in OMP. (I) (COMM) No. 125/2019] had appointed Mr. Justice (Retd.) Jagannadha Rao, the sole arbitrator. according to petitioner, the learned arbitrator had to adjudicate two cases aPO-I and aPO-II. The arbitral proceedings in respect of aPO-II stood concluded and the arbitration award was rendered on 06.06.2021 and 07.07.2021 in respect thereof. However, arguments in aPO-I though commenced but could not be completed owing to illness of the Counsel and restraints of covid pandemic.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner has submitted that an email dated 21.09.2021 has been received from the learned sole arbitrator wherein he has expressed his inability to hear the arguments in aPO-I and, therefore, the present petition has been filed seeking appointment of a substituted arbitrator.

4. Notice issued.

5. Mr. Chandan N. Kamra, advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent.

6. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the case is at the advance stage of hearing arguments and this Court may appoint sole arbitrator and also grant one year time to the arbitral tribunal for preparing and pronouncing the award. Learned counsel for the parties have jointly proposed the name of Mr. Justice (Retd.) Mukul Mudgal for appointment as the sole arbitrator.

7. In view of the above, the present petition is allowed. at the joint request of counsel representing both the sides, Mr. Justice (Retd.) Mukul Mudgal, former Chief Justice of Punjab and Haryana High Court, is appointed sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. The tribunal is granted one year time from today to hear the arguments and render the award.

8. The learned arbitrator shall decide the fee after consultation with the parties.

9. The learned arbitrator shall ensure compliance of Section 12 of arbitration and Conciliation act, 1996 before commencing the arbitration. Needless to say, all issues are left open for adjudication and consideration by the learned arbitrator.

10. a copy of this order be sent to the learned arbitrator for information.

11. The petition and pending application are accordingly disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top