IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, J.
United Telecoms Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Bharat Broadband Network Ltd. - Respondent
O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 23 of 2022 & IA No. 2446 of 2022
Decided On : 14-02-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of arbitration and background (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petition for appointment of sole arbitrator (Para 3 , 6) |
| 3. acceptance of notice by respondent's counsel (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. appointment of arbitrator and guidelines (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. disposition of petition and application (Para 10 , 11) |
1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 15(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of a Sole Arbitrator in substitution.
2. For adjudication of the disputes with respondent, this Court by order dated 25.04.2019 [in OMP. (I) (COMM) No. 125/2019] had appointed Mr. Justice (Retd.) Jagannadha Rao, the sole Arbitrator. According to petitioner, the learned Arbitrator had to adjudicate two cases APO-I and APO-II. The arbitral proceedings in respect of APO-II stood concluded and the arbitration award was rendered on 06.06.2021 and 07.07.2021 in respect thereof. However, arguments in APO-I though commenced but could not be completed owing to illness of the Counsel and restraints of covid pandemic.
3. Learned counsel for petitioner has submitted that an email dated 21.09.2021 has been received from the learned sole arbitrator wherein he has expressed his inability to hear the arguments in APO-I and, therefore, the present petition has been filed seeking appointment of a substituted Arbitrator.
4. Notice issued.
5. Mr. Chandan N. Kamra, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent.
6. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the case is at the advance stage of hearing arguments and this Court may appoint sole Arbitrator and also grant one year time to the arbitral tribunal for preparing and pronouncing the Award. Learned counsel for the parties have jointly proposed the name of Mr. Justice (Retd.) Mukul Mudgal for appointment as the sole Arbitrator.
7. In view of the above, the present petition is allowed. At the joint request of counsel representing both the sides, Mr. Justice (Retd.) Mukul Mudgal, former Chief Justice of Punjab and Haryana High Court, is appointed sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. The tribunal is granted one year time from today to hear the arguments and render the Award.
8. The learned Arbitrator shall decide the fee after consultation with the parties.
9. The learned Arbitrator shall ensure compliance of Section 12 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before commencing the arbitration. Needless to say, all issues are left open for adjudication and consideration by the learned Arbitrator.
10. A copy of this order be sent to the learned Arbitrator for information.
11. The petition and pending application are accordingly disposed of.
The court verified the need for appointing a new Sole Arbitrator due to the incumbent's inability to continue, ensuring a fair arbitration process as per Section 15(2) of the Arbitration and Concilia....
The court has the authority to appoint a substituted arbitrator at the joint request of counsel representing both sides, and the appointed arbitrator must ensure compliance with Section 12 of the arb....
The court ruled that a substituted Arbitrator may be appointed under Section 15(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, emphasizing the need for the Arbitrator's impartiality and independence.
The court has the authority to appoint a substituted Arbitrator when the initially appointed Arbitrator conveys inability to act due to a conflict of interest.
A substituted arbitrator can be appointed under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, following the demise of the previous arbitrator without objection from the parties involved.
Court appointed a new Sole Arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act due to the previous Arbitrator's demise, allowing all parties to raise issues before the new Arbitrator.
Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 does not provide for the substitution or termination of the mandate of an arbitrator, and cannot be invoked to substitute an arbitrator appoin....
The necessity to appoint a new Arbitrator is confirmed under Sections 14 and 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, recognizing the continuation of the arbitration process post-demise of the ori....
The main legal point established is the court's authority to appoint a substituted Arbitrator under the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 following the demise of the previous A....
Court has the discretion to appoint a new Arbitrator to continue unresolved arbitration proceedings, affirming continuity even after the previous Arbitrator's death.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.