SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 1368

MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
Surjeet Kumar Bhogal – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Aayushman Aeron, Advocate, Praddep Kumar Sharma, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. - The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the rejection of the Petitioner's candidature for the post of Sub-Inspector in Delhi Police, CaPFs and assistant Sub-Inspector in CISF Examination 2019 [2019 Exam] at the stage of Document Verification as his date of discharge from the Indian army was beyond the cut-off date as stipulated in the 2019 Examination guidelines.

3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that at the time of applying for the 2019 Exam under the Ex-serviceman quota, the Petitioner was serving as a Sepoy in the Indian army and was due to be discharged. He emphasises that the Terms of Engagement of a Sepoy are initially for a period of fifteen years.

4. He states that as per the examination guidelines, the candidate had to acquire the Ex-Serviceman status on or before 15th October 2020 to be eligible under the 2019 Exam.

5. He states that the Petitioner's original date of discharge was 13th January 2019, however, since he had taken an extension of two years, his effective discharge date from the army was January 2021 and not 13th January 2019. He points out that vide discharge

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top