SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
Surjeet Kumar Bhogal - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 2603 of 2022
Decided On : 10-02-2022




Effective discharge date determines Ex-Serviceman status for examination eligibility; an advance No Objection Certificate does not qualify applicants prior to actual discharge.

Headnote:(A) Examination Guidelines for Ex-Serviceman Quota - Dismissal of candidature due to discharge date beyond cut-off - Petitioner argued eligibility based on initial terms and No Objection Certificate - Court held effective discharge date determines Ex-Serviceman status, citing past decision as precedent. (Paras 5-10)

(B) Writ Petition - Scope of interference concerning administrative decisions - Not permissible if no merit demonstrated. (Paras 8-10)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged rejection for Sub-Inspector post, claiming eligibility under Ex-Serviceman quota despite extended military service, contesting discharge date of 31st January 2021 invalidates application for 2019 examination guidelines.

Findings of Court:
The Court finds the petition lacks merit as the effective discharge date governs Ex-Serviceman status, supported by analogous prior ruling.

Issues: Whether the Petitioner qualifies as an Ex-Serviceman for eligibility under the 2019 Exam guidelines based on discharge and No Objection Certificate.

Ratio Decidendi: Court concludes the effective date of discharge is determinative for Ex-Serviceman status, and an advance No Objection Certificate does not alter this requirement.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. eligibility criteria for ex-serviceman status (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. court's interpretation of discharge and employment eligibility (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
3. final dismissal of the writ petition (Para 10)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J.: (Oral)--The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the rejection of the Petitioner's candidature for the post of Sub-Inspector in Delhi Police, CAPFs and Assistant Sub-Inspector in CISF Examination 2019 [2019 Exam] at the stage of Document Verification as his date of discharge from the Indian Army was beyond the cut-off date as stipulated in the 2019 Examination guidelines.

3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that at the time of applying for the 2019 Exam under the Ex-serviceman quota, the Petitioner was serving as a Sepoy in the Indian Army and was due to be discharged. He emphasises that the Terms of Engagement of a Sepoy are initially for a period of fifteen years.

4. He states that as per the examination guidelines, the candidate had to acquire the Ex-Serviceman status on or before 15th October 2020 to be eligible under the 2019 Exam.

5. He states that the Petitioner's original date of discharge was 13th January 2019, however, since he had taken an extension of two years, his effective discharge date from the Army was January 2021 and not 13th January 2019. He points out that vide discharge order dated 13th January 2019, the Petitioner was to be discharged on 31st January 2021. He contends that the Petitioner completed the initial term of engagement in January 2019 and was thus eligible for the status of an Ex-Serviceman.

6. He further states that the Respondent-Indian Army had issued a No Objection Certificate dated 02nd May 2020 to the Petitioner and, therefore, he was eligible to apply under the 2019 Examination guidelines.

7. However, this Court is of the opinion that as the Petitioner's employment was extended by two years, he attained the status of an Ex- Serviceman only on the date of his discharge i.e. 31st January, 2021.

8. The release of No Objection Certificate for civil employment on 02nd May, 2020 was to allow the Petitioner to take up employment immediately after the date of his discharge. In the event the Petitioner had to obtain the No Objection Certificate for civil employment post-retirement, then in that eventuality, he would not be able to take a new employment immediately on the date of his discharge.

9. Consequently, release of the No Objection Certificate in advance would not make the Petitioner eligible to apply against the Ex-Serviceman quota prior to the date of his actual discharge.

10. This Court also finds that a Coordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) No.520/2020 titled Mukesh Kumar vs. Union of India & Ors. dated 01st December, 2020 has taken a similar view. Consequently, the present writ petition, being bereft of merits, is dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top