SURESH KUMAR KAIT
DLF Limited – Appellant
Versus
Ranutrol Industries Pvt Ltd – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Suresh Kumar Kait, J. - The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the arbitration and Conciliation act, 1996 seeking appointment of sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes inter se the parties.
2. Pertinently, petitioner is a limited company incorporated under the Companies act, 1956 and is involved in the business of providing development, management and investment services in relation to real estate projects.
3. according to the petitioner, respondent is a private limited company incorporated under the Companies act, 1956 and is engaged in the business of sanitary goods such as bottle traps, angle valves, towel rods, water mixers, extension nipples, pillar cocks etc.
4. as per the averments made in the present petition, petitioner issued a purchase orders bearing no. ULT/POD/0013/1718 and SKT/POD/0016/1718 to the respondent with respect to purchase of sanitary goods such as bottle trap, angle valve, health faucets, etc. and in respect thereof, a warranty certificate was issued by the respondent stating that if any manufacturing defects are found, replacement will be provided on FOC basis. Thereafter on 10.05.2018, petitioner's project management consult
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to appoint a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes between....
Disputes arising from defective goods supplied are arbitrable under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, and an arbitrator can be appointed for resolution per the terms of the underlying purchase or....
The main legal point established is the court's authority to appoint a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the arbitration and Conciliation act, 1996 when the parties fail to mutually appoint one,....
In the absence of opposition, a court may appoint an arbitrator based on deemed service through electronic means for resolving contractual disputes.
The court has the authority to appoint a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 when the parties fail to agree on the appointment.
The court's decision emphasized the arbitrability of the disputes and the appointment of a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the arbitration and Conciliation act, 1996.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's power to appoint an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 when no arbitrator has been appointed ....
The main legal point established is the court's authority to appoint a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes between parties.
Unilateral appointment of an Arbitrator is not acceptable, and an Arbitrator must be appointed in accordance with the arbitration agreement and the provisions of the Standard Conditions of Supply Ord....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the appointment of a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate the disputes between the parti....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.