Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
DLF Limited – Appellant
Versus
Ranutrol Industries Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arbitration petition filed under section 11(6) (Para 1) |
| 2. identities and businesses of the parties (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. disputes over defective goods and proposed termination (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. legal notice and invocation of arbitration clause (Para 6) |
| 5. respondent's acknowledgment of arbitrability (Para 7) |
| 6. appointment and compliance of the arbitrator (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 7. disposal of the petition and order for the arbitrator (Para 11 , 12) |
The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes inter se the parties.
2. Pertinently, petitioner is a limited company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and is involved in the business of providing development, management and investment services in relation to real estate projects.
3. According to the petitioner, respondent is a private limited company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and is engaged in the business of sanitary goods such as bottle traps, angle valves, towel rods, water mixers, extension nipples, pillar
Disputes arising from defective goods supplied are arbitrable under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, and an arbitrator can be appointed for resolution per the terms of the underlying purchase or....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to appoint a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes between....
In the absence of opposition, a court may appoint an arbitrator based on deemed service through electronic means for resolving contractual disputes.
The court emphasized the enforceability of the arbitration clause within the Vendor Agreement and affirmed that disputes unresolved after the allotted period warrant formal arbitration under Section ....
The court confirmed the right to appoint an arbitrator due to the respondent's non-compliance with the terms of the agreement, affirming that the disputes were arbitrable.
The court emphasized the arbitrability of disputes and the appointment of a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
The court can appoint an Arbitrator when parties fail to mutually agree, as per agreement provisions and arbitration law.
Disputes under contracts with the Union of India are arbitrable, and the appointment of an independent arbitrator is necessary for their resolution under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Concilia....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's power to appoint an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 when no arbitrator has been appointed ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
