Suresh Kumar vs Sports Authority Of India And Another

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Del) 1394

YASHWANT VARMA
Suresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Sports Authority Of India And Another – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Avneesh Arputham, Advocate, Sanjib Kumar Mohanty, Advocate, Shashank, Advocate, Awadhesh Kumar Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Yashwant Varma, J. - The challenge in the present writ petition is to the orders of 12 april 2019 and 18 September 2019. In terms of the first order of 12 april 2019, the respondents have proceeded to cancel the allotment of the General Pool Residential accommodation [GPRa] being occupied by the petitioner here. Consequential directions for his eviction were also framed. By the second order of 18 September 2019, the respondents have conveyed their decision to refuse the prayer for regularization as made by the petitioner here.

2. Undisputedly, the accommodation in question forms part of premises falling in the GPRa pool of the respondents. The petitioner was appointed as a Lifeguard with the Sports authority of India [SaI] - respondent No.1 here. It is his case that pursuant to an application which was made by him, the Directorate of Estate by an order of 29 april 2015, allotted the premises in question. It is also borne out from the record that the deductions towards rent and other statutory dues payable in respect of the premises were initially deducted from the salary of the petitioner by the respondent No.1 and duly transmitted. However, and is apparent from the record,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document