PRATEEK JALAN
Sandeep Bhalla – Appellant
Versus
Reserve Bank Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is directed principally against directives dated 23.09.2019, 26.09.2019, 03.10.2019, 14.10.2019 and 05.11.2019 issued by the respondent No.1-Reserve Bank of India [hereinafter, “RBI”]. By the aforesaid directives, issued under Section 35A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 [hereinafter, “BR Act”], the RBI imposed certain restrictions on withdrawals by depositors from their accounts in respondent No.2 Punjab and Maharashtra Co-operative Bank Limited [hereinafter, “PMC Bank”].
A. Factual Background
2. The petitioners are account holders in PMC Bank. The petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 are the parents of petitioner No. 1. The petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 hold four fixed deposits in PMC Bank amounting to a total of Rs.97 lakhs. The contentions in the writ petition are that PMC Bank was established in the year 1984 as an Urban Cooperative Bank [hereinafter, “UCB”]. It was conferred with the status of a Scheduled Bank in the year 2000 and with the status of a Multi-State Urban Co-operative Bank in the year 2004.
3. According to the petitioners, PMC Bank’s annual reports for the year 2018-19 showed deposits in excess of Rs.11,000 cr
Holystar Natural Resources Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India
Pramod Malhotra and Others vs. Union of India and Others
Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. Limited and Another vs. Reserve Bank of India
Re: Special Reference No. 1 of 2012 [2012 (10) SCC 1]
Shri Sitaram Sugar Company Limited and Another vs. Union of India and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.