Back
N. SATHISH KUMAR
G. Deepa – Appellant
Versus
General Manager, ICICI Bank Ltd. – Respondent
ORDER :
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for all the records on the file of the 5th Respondent in DBOD.No.Com.Bc.28/C.408(A)-81 as illegal and unconstitutional opposed to the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, set aside the same and consequently direct the 1st Respondent to pay compensation to the petitioner amounting to Rs.1,00,000/- for failing to honour the value of the cheques without any justifiable reason.
This Writ Petition has been filed to set aside the circular in DBOD.No.Com.Bc.28/C.408(A)-81 on the file of the 5th Respondent in DBOD. No.Com.Bc.28/C.408(A)-81 as illegal and unconstitutional opposed to the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and direct the 1st Respondent to pay compensation to the petitioner amounting to Rs.1,00,000/- for failing to honour the value of the cheques without any justifiable reason.
2. The 2nd Petitioner was impleaded on 30.09.2022.
3.a. It is the case of the Writ Petitioner that the 2nd Petitioner is an account holder with 3rd Respondent in Account No.00201005546 and issued a cheque for Rs.48,000/- dated 28.07.2007 in favour of the 1st Petitioner to withdra
The RBI's imposition of directives under Section 35A of the Banking Regulation Act does not necessitate pre-decisional hearings, emphasizing the need for depositor protection over procedural formalit....
The circulars restricting District Central Co-operative Banks from accepting specified bank notes during demonetisation were lawful and did not violate statutory provisions, ensuring financial integr....
Particular role of RBI as an important functionary in economic and financial system of country, with expertise in matters entrusted to it.
Writ under Article 226 maintainable against private scheduled banks to enforce RBI guidelines; customer zero liability in unauthorized electronic transactions from third-party breaches like SIM swapp....
Limited Liability of a Customer - Unauthorized aforesaid banking transactions in the bank account of petitioner as per Clause VI of the aforequoted policy of R.B.I., petitioner is entitled to zero li....
A cheque that exceeds the permissible limit as per RBI policy is void; lower courts erred in conviction without recognizing this fact.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
