JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma,J. - Background Facts

1. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned Award dated 05.05.2014 passed in ID No.02/2014 titled Sh. Narender Bahadur Singh Vs Corporation Bank, whereby, the learned CGIT cum Labour Court directed the respondent bank to pay compensation in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- by way of damages to the petitioner/workman.

2. The facts, in brief, are that the petitioner/workman had filed a statement of claim against the respondent bank seeking the relief of reinstatement. The petitioner/workmen had alleged that he was employed by the respondent bank and was placed at Karol Bagh, Delhi branch on the sanctioned post of a Car driver with effect from 01.11.1999. The service of the petitioner/workman was terminated on 13.07.2006 without assigning any reason or cause of action. It was alleged that the respondent bank had neither issued a notice nor complied with the provisions of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The petitioner/workmen also sent a demand notice to the respondent bank which remained un-responded. The contention of the petitioner/workman is that the petitioner/workman along with the other workman had