Back
MINI PUSHKARNA
Master Prabhnoor Singh Virdi (Minor Son) Through Father Karamjeet Singh Virdi (Father) – Appellant
Versus
Indian School – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
[Mini Pushkarna, J.] :
1. The present writ petition has been filed with grievance that name of the petitioner child has been struck off from the school due to non-payment of fees and despite the fact that the petitioner is a student of Class 10th. The petition has been listed upon urgent mentioning since the Class 10th Board Examination (Practical Exams) are scheduled from tomorrow i.e. 18.01.2023, which constitute substantial part of the upcoming final Class 10th Board Examination. Thus, the present petition has been filed with prayer for direction to the respondent No. 1 school to reinstate the petitioner as a student on its rolls and allow the petitioner child to sit in the upcoming CBSE Board Exams for Class 10th.
2. It is the case on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has been studying in the respondent No. 1 school since the Academic Year 2011-12. The petitioner has made all the past payments of the school fees in a time bound manner till before the onset of Covid – 19. Thus, the fees till January, 2021 has been cleared by the petitioner.
3. It is the case of the petitioner that due to the financial losses faced by his father, he was unable to clear the fe
The principle of forum non conveniens allows courts to decline jurisdiction if a more appropriate forum exists, particularly in education-related disputes where the School is located outside the cour....
Unaided minority schools affiliated to central board but accepting state NOC and RTE approval cannot expel students aged 6-14 for fee non-payment before elementary education completion; limited to la....
Education Law - Non-payment of fees - Mere presence of CBSE as a respondent in petition is not sufficient to enable this Court to exercise jurisdiction under Article 226 of Constitution. The Court ma....
The RTE Act is a self-contained legislation and the operation thereof is unhindered by the Delhi School Education Act and Rules framed thereunder.
The court upheld the right of private educational institutions to collect tuition fees during the pandemic, stating government prohibitions exceeded authority and disrupted financial sustainability.
The Delhi School Education Act mandates private schools to align salaries of their employees with those of corresponding positions in government institutions, regardless of the school's financial sta....
The Delhi School Education Act mandates private schools comply with government salary norms for employees, irrespective of financial status, reinforcing the principle of statutory obligation over har....
Financial hardship cannot justify non-compliance with statutory mandates, and employees of recognized private schools are entitled to benefits similar to those of government-run schools as per Sectio....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
