SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 245

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
Master Medhansh Jhawar @ Madhav Through His Natural Guardian – Appellant
Versus
Rajesh Bhushan & Ors. – Respondent
Cont.Cas(C) 415 of 2022 & CM APPL. 18280 of 2022, W.P.(C) 5315 of 2020 & CM APPL. 19189 of 2020, 4237 of 2023, W.P.(C) 11610 of 2017 & CM APPL. 27637 of 2018, 44016 of 2022, W.P.(C) 2943 of 2020 & CM APPLs. 10227 of 2020, 10228 of 2020, 6633 of 2022, W.P.(C) 10782 of 2020 & CM APPL. 33828 of 2020, W.P.(C) 322 of 2021 & CM APPL. 812 of 2021, W.P.(C) 1491 of 2021 & CM APPLs. 4291 of 2021, 8671 of 2022, W.P.(C) 1511 of 2021 & CM APPL. 4331 of 2021, 8616 of 2022, W.P.(C) 1611 of 2021 & CM APPL. 4600 of 2021, W.P.(C) 3662 of 2021 & CM APPLs. 11103 of 2021, 25590 of 2021, 32504 of 2021, W.P.(C) 3682 of 2021 & CM APPL. 11153 of 2021, W.P.(C) 3689 of 2021 & CM APPL.11179 of 2021, W.P.(C) 3706 of 2021 & CM APPL. 11229 of 2021, W.P. (C) 3707 of 2021 & CM APPL. 11230 of 2021, W.P.(C) 3729 of 2021 & CM APPL. 11269 of 2021, W.P.(C) 3737 of 2021 & CM APPL. 11277 of 2021, W.P.(C) 3859 of 2021 & CM APPL. 11647 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4045 of 2021 & CM APPL. 12213 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4067 of 2021 & CM APPL. 12306 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4259 of 2021 & CM APPL. 12948 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4304 of 2021 & CM APPL. 13108 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4551 of 2021 & CM APPL. 13949 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4812 of 2021 & CM APPL. 14844 of 2021, W.P.(C) 5394 of 2021 & CM APPL. 16683 of 2021, W.P.(C) 5395 of 2021 & CM APPL. 16686 of 2021, W.P.(C) 9684 of 2021, W.P.(C) 14317 of 2021 & CM APPL. 45148 of 2021, W.P.(C) 1182 of 2022 & CM APPL. 3442 of 2022, W.P.(C) 1054 of 2023 and CM APPL. 4164 of 2023, W.P.(C) 1079 of 2023 and CM APPL. 4248 of 2023
Decided on : 30-01-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Rahul Malhotra, Ms. Shyel Trehan, Mr. Rohan Poddar, Adv.
For the Respondent:Mr. Kirtiman Singh, Ms. Vidhi Jain, Mr. Tanveer Oberoi and Mr. Jaswinder Singh, Advocate

Headnote:

All India Institute of Medical Science – Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy – Administration of Antisense – Petitions has been filed by Petitioners who are mostly children suffering from Rare Diseases – Case of Petitioners is that medicines and therapies for said diseases are exorbitantly expensive and directions ought to be issued to Respondents Union of India and its Ministry of Health and Family Welfare – Held, Court virtually has revealed that supply orders have not been placed submits funds were released in respect of few patients tender process took time – Ministry of Health & Family Welfare way back non-placing of purchase orders supply orders on M/s Sarepta would be a grossly negligent attitude adopted by concerned persons at AIIMS – Order Accordingly.

JUDGMENT :

Prathiba M. Singh, J.

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The present batch of petitions has been filed by the Petitioners who are mostly children suffering from Rare Diseases. The case of the Petitioners is that the medicines and therapies for the said diseases are exorbitantly expensive, and directions ought to be issued to the Respondents i.e., the Union of India and its Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, All India Institute of Medical Science (hereinafter, "AIIMS"), as well as, the GNCTD, to provide continuous and uninterrupted treatment to the Petitioners, free of cost.

3. These matters have been heard by the Court from time to time and various directions have been issued for enabling treatment and for making available medicines to the Petitioners.

Indigenous Development of Treatment, Therapies & Medicines for Rare Diseases

4. In terms of the Memorandum of Understanding dated 8th January, 2021 signed between M/s Hanugen Therapeutics Private Limited (hereinafter ‘Hanugen’) and the Biotechnology Industry Research Assistance Council (hereinafter ‘BIRAC’), Hanugen was to conduct a multi-centric study for the therapeutic evaluation in respect of DMD patients. The total approved amount for the project was Rs.9.24 crores. As per the MoU, 50% of the said amount was to be provided by BIRAC and the other 50% was to be contributed by Hanugen.

5. On 9th December, 2022, this Court was apprised that the commencement of clinical trials was delayed due to lack of funds. In view of the said submission, the Court had directed the ld. CGSC to seek instructions as to whether a sum of Rs. 5 crores can be released from the Rare Diseases Fund in favour of Hanugen in order to enable the commencement of clinical trial.

6. Thereafter, an affidavit dated 17th December, 2022 was filed on behalf of Hanugen stating that the total budget for clinical trial involving 54 patients would be Rs.13.50 crores. Out of the said amount, Rs.1.41 crore each was already put in by Hanugen and BIRAC. Thus, the total outstanding amount was Rs.10.67 crores. The affidavit further stated that for the first 6 months only 50% of the patients would receive the drug, so to begin the trial, an amount of Rs.5.35 crores was needed by Hanugen.

7. Upon hearing the parties, the Court had passed the following order on 22nd December, 2022:

    “17. At this point in time, the clear position of Hanugen and DART is that they are unable to fund their portion of the amount as per the Memorandum of Understanding dated 8th January, 2021 signed between the Biotechnology Industry Research Assistance Council (BIRAC) and M/s. Hanugen Therapeutics Private Limited (hereinafter, “Hanugen”). It is submitted that if the clinical trial is conducted by administering the medicines in respect of half of the total of 54 patients, the total budgetary requirement for commencing the said trial, would be a sum of approximately Rs.5.35 crores that would be required by Hanugen. It was in this background that the Court had issued the directions relating to release of Rs.5 crores, as extracted hereinabove.

18. Upon a query put by the Court, insofar as the direction for disbursement of Rs.5 crores to Hanugen is concerned, it is submitted that a sum of Rs.1.41 crores has already been released by BIRAC, in favour of Hanugen. The remaining amount which is to be released by BIRAC, in terms of the said MoU, would be approximately Rs.3.2 crores.

19. Keeping all the above factors in mind, it is directed that the clinical trials, in the manner as specified in its affidavit dated 17th December, 2022, ought to be commenced and conducted by Hanugen.

Under such circumstances, considering the part funding which has already been disbursed, as also, the lack of funds with Hanugen at this point in time, it is deemed appropriate to direct that an amount to the tune of Rs.5.35 crores shall be released by BIRAC

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon Back to top