IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
Master Medhansh Jhawar @ Madhav Through His Natural Guardian – Appellant
Versus
Rajesh Bhushan & Ors. – Respondent
Cont.Cas(C) 415 of 2022 & CM APPL. 18280 of 2022, W.P.(C) 5315 of 2020 & CM APPL. 19189 of 2020, 4237 of 2023, W.P.(C) 11610 of 2017 & CM APPL. 27637 of 2018, 44016 of 2022, W.P.(C) 2943 of 2020 & CM APPLs. 10227 of 2020, 10228 of 2020, 6633 of 2022, W.P.(C) 10782 of 2020 & CM APPL. 33828 of 2020, W.P.(C) 322 of 2021 & CM APPL. 812 of 2021, W.P.(C) 1491 of 2021 & CM APPLs. 4291 of 2021, 8671 of 2022, W.P.(C) 1511 of 2021 & CM APPL. 4331 of 2021, 8616 of 2022, W.P.(C) 1611 of 2021 & CM APPL. 4600 of 2021, W.P.(C) 3662 of 2021 & CM APPLs. 11103 of 2021, 25590 of 2021, 32504 of 2021, W.P.(C) 3682 of 2021 & CM APPL. 11153 of 2021, W.P.(C) 3689 of 2021 & CM APPL.11179 of 2021, W.P.(C) 3706 of 2021 & CM APPL. 11229 of 2021, W.P. (C) 3707 of 2021 & CM APPL. 11230 of 2021, W.P.(C) 3729 of 2021 & CM APPL. 11269 of 2021, W.P.(C) 3737 of 2021 & CM APPL. 11277 of 2021, W.P.(C) 3859 of 2021 & CM APPL. 11647 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4045 of 2021 & CM APPL. 12213 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4067 of 2021 & CM APPL. 12306 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4259 of 2021 & CM APPL. 12948 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4304 of 2021 & CM APPL. 13108 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4551 of 2021 & CM APPL. 13949 of 2021, W.P.(C) 4812 of 2021 & CM APPL. 14844 of 2021, W.P.(C) 5394 of 2021 & CM APPL. 16683 of 2021, W.P.(C) 5395 of 2021 & CM APPL. 16686 of 2021, W.P.(C) 9684 of 2021, W.P.(C) 14317 of 2021 & CM APPL. 45148 of 2021, W.P.(C) 1182 of 2022 & CM APPL. 3442 of 2022, W.P.(C) 1054 of 2023 and CM APPL. 4164 of 2023, W.P.(C) 1079 of 2023 and CM APPL. 4248 of 2023
Decided on : 30-01-2023
All India Institute of Medical Science – Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy – Administration of Antisense – Petitions has been filed by Petitioners who are mostly children suffering from Rare Diseases – Case of Petitioners is that medicines and therapies for said diseases are exorbitantly expensive and directions ought to be issued to Respondents Union of India and its Ministry of Health and Family Welfare – Held, Court virtually has revealed that supply orders have not been placed submits funds were released in respect of few patients tender process took time – Ministry of Health & Family Welfare way back non-placing of purchase orders supply orders on M/s Sarepta would be a grossly negligent attitude adopted by concerned persons at AIIMS – Order Accordingly.
JUDGMENT :
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. The present batch of petitions has been filed by the Petitioners who are mostly children suffering from Rare Diseases. The case of the Petitioners is that the medicines and therapies for the said diseases are exorbitantly expensive, and directions ought to be issued to the Respondents i.e., the Union of India and its Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, All India Institute of Medical Science (hereinafter, "AIIMS"), as well as, the GNCTD, to provide continuous and uninterrupted treatment to the Petitioners, free of cost.
3. These matters have been heard by the Court from time to time and various directions have been issued for enabling treatment and for making available medicines to the Petitioners.
Indigenous Development of Treatment, Therapies & Medicines for Rare Diseases
4. In terms of the Memorandum of Understanding dated 8th January, 2021 signed between M/s Hanugen Therapeutics Private Limited (hereinafter ‘Hanugen’) and the Biotechnology Industry Research Assistance Council (hereinafter ‘BIRAC’), Hanugen was to conduct a multi-centric study for the therapeutic evaluation in respect of DMD patients. The total approved amount for the project was Rs.9.24 crores. As per the MoU, 50% of the said amount was to be provided by BIRAC and the other 50% was to be contributed by Hanugen.
5. On 9th December, 2022, this Court was apprised that the commencement of clinical trials was delayed due to lack of funds. In view of the said submission, the Court had directed the ld. CGSC to seek instructions as to whether a sum of Rs. 5 crores can be released from the Rare Diseases Fund in favour of Hanugen in order to enable the commencement of clinical trial.
6. Thereafter, an affidavit dated 17th December, 2022 was filed on behalf of Hanugen stating that the total budget for clinical trial involving 54 patients would be Rs.13.50 crores. Out of the said amount, Rs.1.41 crore each was already put in by Hanugen and BIRAC. Thus, the total outstanding amount was Rs.10.67 crores. The affidavit further stated that for the first 6 months only 50% of the patients would receive the drug, so to begin the trial, an amount of Rs.5.35 crores was needed by Hanugen.
7. Upon hearing the parties, the Court had passed the following order on 22nd December, 2022:
18. Upon a query put by the Court, insofar as the direction for disbursement of Rs.5 crores to Hanugen is concerned, it is submitted that a sum of Rs.1.41 crores has already been released by BIRAC, in favour of Hanugen. The remaining amount which is to be released by BIRAC, in terms of the said MoU, would be approximately Rs.3.2 crores.
19. Keeping all the above factors in mind, it is directed that the clinical trials, in the manner as specified in its affidavit dated 17th December, 2022, ought to be commenced and conducted by Hanugen.
Under such circumstances, considering the part funding which has already been disbursed, as also, the lack of funds with Hanugen at this point in time, it is deemed appropriate to direct that an amount to the tune of Rs.5.35 crores shall be released by BIRAC
The government has an obligation to invest in research for indigenous therapies, and the court can direct the commencement of treatment and release of funds for rare diseases treatment under the Rare....
The court emphasized the need for immediate treatment and funding for rare diseases, and referred the matter to the National Consortium for comprehensive recommendations.
The Court emphasized the need for efficient decision-making by the COE Committee and expressed concern over lapsing budgets and non-release of funds for the treatment of children suffering from Rare ....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the need to facilitate the conduct of clinical trials, streamline the manufacturing and trials process, and ensure the implementation of the Nat....
The court affirmed that the right to health, as part of the fundamental right to life under Article 21, requires timely access to treatment, especially for children with rare diseases.
The fundamental right to health and healthcare under Article 21 of the Constitution necessitates ensuring treatment for Rare Diseases despite exorbitant costs, and the government's obligation to fina....
The court prioritized the expedited release of medicines for rare diseases and facilitated discussions and meetings between relevant parties to ensure the availability of treatment for petitioners.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the need to ensure timely access to medications for patients and the importance of expediting the process of medicines procurement at the nation....
The importance of funding for Rare Diseases patients and the modification of court orders regarding personal appearance.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.