IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Master Arnesh Shaw - Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Anr. - Respondents
W.P.(C) 5315 of 2020 & CM APPL. 19189 of 2020, 4237 of 2023
Decided On : 22-03-2024
Rare Diseases - Treatment of Children - National Policy for Rare Diseases, 2021 - CTRI No. CTRI/2021/04/032498, NDCT RULES, 2019, Form CT-06, Form Ct-11, Clinical Trial Agreement - Gazette notification G.S.R. 235 (E) dated 29th March, 20232 - List 38 - Gaucher Disease Type I and III, Hunter syndrome (MPS II), Pompe Disease, Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy, Spinal Muscular Atrophy
Fact of the Case:
The court reviewed the status of treatment for children suffering from rare diseases, including the number of petitioners receiving treatment, clinical trials, and evaluations. The court also directed meetings between various parties to discuss clinical trials and the release of medicines for patients.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that negotiations were underway for the release of medicines and directed customs authorities to expedite the release of medicines for rare diseases. The court also directed meetings between the National Rare Diseases' Committee and pharmaceutical companies for further discussions.
Issues: Status of treatment for children with rare diseases, clinical trials, negotiations for the release of medicines, customs duty exemption for medicines for rare diseases
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of expediting the release of medicines for rare diseases and directed meetings between relevant parties to facilitate clinical trials and treatment for petitioners.
Final Decision: The court dismissed one petition and scheduled the matters for final hearing on 10th May, 2024.
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral) - This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. The present batch of petitions have been filed by the Petitioners who are children suffering from rare diseases. These matters have been heard by the Court from time to time and various directions have been issued for enabling treatment and making medicines available to the Petitioners.
Status of the writ petitioners
3. On 19th January, 2024, AIIMS was directed to submit a chart regarding the status of treatment of each of the Petitioners before this Court. Further, on the said date, notice was issued in the petitions bearing no. W.P.(C) 436/2024 & W.P.(C) 479/2024, and AIIMS was directed to examine the case of these patients, and to place a status report in that regard.
4. Today, vide status report dated 23rd February, 2024, the status of all the petitioners is provided as follows:
-19 Petitioners were found amenable to the Exon-51 Skipping Therapy
-16 Petitioners were found amenable to the Exon-53 Skipping Therapy
-15 Petitioners were found amenable to the Exon-45 Skipping Therapy
5. Thus, the following table encapsulates the position in relation to treatment of children as on date:
| S.No. | Category | Number of Petitioners |
| 1 | DMD Petitioners who have received treatment of Rs.50 lakhs and for whom further medicines are to be provided by M/s Sarepta | 14 |
| 2 | DMD Petitioners who have been enrolled in clinical trials | 2 |
| 3 | DMD Petitioners found amenable to treatment | 19+16+15=50 |
| 4 | DMD Petitioners evaluated as non-amenable to treatment | 31 |
| 5 | Non-DMD Petitioners who have received treatment of Rs.50 lakhs and are continuing to receive treatment under orders of this Hon'ble Court | 4 |
| 6 | Non-DMD Petitioners who have received treatment of Rs.50 lakhs | 1 |
| 7 | Non-DMD Petitioners evaluated as nonamenable to treatment | 4 |
| 8 | Petitioners still under evaluation | 2 |
| 9 | Patients refused treatment/evaluation | 3 |
| Total | 111 |
Meeting between DART and AIIMS
6. Thereafter, on 26th February, 2024, this Court directed as follows:
"7. Today, at the outset, two important issues have been raised:
i) Ms. Trehen, ld. Amicus, informs the Court that she has learned that M/s Hanugen Therapeutics has approached AIIMS for clinical trials in respect of three Exon Skipping Therapies, namely, Exon 51, Exon 53, and Exon 45. These are the three therapies which are made available even through M/s. Sarepta Therapeutics. Dr. Madhulika Kabra and Dr. Sheffali from AIIMS have confirmed that M/s. Hanugen Therapeutics has reached out to them last week, and the exact nature of the trial and the number of persons who can be enrolled has not yet been made clear. Mr. Oberoi, ld. Counsel for AIIMS also confirms this position, and stated that DART has reached out to take the trials forward. Thus, let AIIMS file an affidavit within one week, after meeting with M/s Hanugen Therapeutics Pvt. Ltd. as to the nature of the clinical trial. The details of the clini
The government has an obligation to invest in research for indigenous therapies, and the court can direct the commencement of treatment and release of funds for rare diseases treatment under the Rare....
The court emphasized the need for immediate treatment and funding for rare diseases, and referred the matter to the National Consortium for comprehensive recommendations.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the need to facilitate the conduct of clinical trials, streamline the manufacturing and trials process, and ensure the implementation of the Nat....
The Court emphasized the need for efficient decision-making by the COE Committee and expressed concern over lapsing budgets and non-release of funds for the treatment of children suffering from Rare ....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the need to ensure timely access to medications for patients and the importance of expediting the process of medicines procurement at the nation....
The court mandated that the government ensure timely treatment and funding for patients suffering from rare diseases, establishing a comprehensive framework to facilitate compliance with health polic....
The court emphasized the need for the government to facilitate funding and develop indigenous treatments for rare diseases, considering them a national priority.
The fundamental right to health and healthcare under Article 21 of the Constitution necessitates ensuring treatment for Rare Diseases despite exorbitant costs, and the government's obligation to fina....
The court emphasized the right to continuous and uninterrupted treatment for patients suffering from rare diseases under the National Rare Diseases Policy, 2021.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.