SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 2439

RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
Dipti Purty @ Sunita – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Raghuvinder Verma, APP for the State.

ORDER

Rajnish Bhatnagar, J. The present bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in case FIR No. 44/2015 under Sections 18/29/61/85 of NDPS Act registered at P.S. Special Cell Delhi.

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that some mobile numbers i.e. 9582461280, 9654123551, 7351687855 and few others used by suspicious persons suspectedly indulging in illegal activities were under lawful interception in the office of Special Cell/NR, Sector- 06, Rohini, Delhi. During interception of these mobile numbers, efforts were made to identify these suspicious persons from technical surveillance. During this process users of above mentioned mobile numbers were found indulged in drug trafficking activities and they used to visit Delhi frequently. Although users of these mobile numbers were very cautious about their conversation and they used code words and sometimes they communicate through SMS but some time they were heard talking about quality, rate and quantity of drugs.

3. SI Jeetendra Tiwari was deputed to monitor the interception of above mobile numbers and he used to brief Insp. Attar Singh about the outcome of said interce

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top