IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
DIVYESH A. JOSHI, J.
Pinkesh @ Pinko Shantilal Patel – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
Criminal Misc. Application No. 4050 of 2024
Decided On : 15-03-2024
NDPS Act - Regular Bail - Section 8(c), 20(B), II (C) and 29 - 37
Fact of the Case:
The applicant was arrested in connection with an FIR for possession and trafficking of contraband substance Charas. The prosecution alleged that the accused was found with a significant quantity of Charas and was involved in a larger drug trafficking operation. The applicant sought regular bail, while the State opposed it citing the gravity of the offence and the commercial quantity of the contraband substance involved.
Finding of the Court:
The court analyzed the provisions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which makes offences under the Act cognizable and non-bailable, especially for offences involving commercial quantity. The court emphasized the stringent conditions for granting bail under the Act and the legislative intent to curb drug trafficking. It considered the gravity of the offence and the accused's role in the larger drug trafficking operation, ultimately rejecting the bail application.
Issues: The main issue was whether the applicant, charged with possession and trafficking of a commercial quantity of contraband substance Charas, should be granted regular bail under the NDPS Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the provisions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which impose stringent conditions for granting bail in cases involving commercial quantity of contraband substances. The court emphasized the legislative intent to curb drug trafficking and the potential impact on society, especially the youth. It considered the reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is not guilty of the offence and that the accused is not likely to commit any offence while on bail, as prescribed under Section 37(b) (ii) of the Act.
Final Decision: The court rejected the bail application, stating that the conditions stipulated under Section 37 of the Act were not satisfied and there were no reasonable grounds to presume the accused as not being guilty of the offence. The bail application was deemed devoid of merit and hence, liable to be rejected.
JUDGMENT :
DIVYESH A. JOSHI, J.
1. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned APP waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent-State.
2. The present application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for regular bail in connection with the FIR being C.R. No. 11210050231274 of 2023 registered with the Rander Police Station, Surat of the offence punishable under Sections 8(c), 20(B), II (C) and 29 of the NDPS Act.
3. The case of the prosecution, in brief, may be summarized as under:
3.2 Thereafter, after following all necessary procedure of raid and drawing panchnamas, all the members of the raiding party reached at the pointed place at around 16:00 hours and scattered at different places of the street in a way that they can keep a watch of the movement of the people coming from both the sides of the street by disguise themselves.
3.3 Thereafter, after 45 minutes, the person as described in the secret information, seen passing through the said street carrying the yellow bag, who was cordoned by the police at 16:56 hours near Sejal Complex and then arrested. After that, the superior officer introduced himself to the said person, and upon asking his identity, he identified himself as Jaggu S/o Girishbhai Bhagat, aged about 26, a resident of Rander, Surat. Thereafter, as it was difficult to go ahead with the further procedure at such a public place, the said person was taken to the office situated in the parking of the ‘D’ Block of Sejal Complex where the further procedure was being carried out.
3.4 Thereafter, the said person got acquainted about the secret information. After that, requisite procedure under Sections 43 and 50 of the NDPS Act was also followed. Personal search of the accused person was also made, however, nothing objectionable was found upon his personal search. After that, the yellow coloured bag which the accused was carrying was also being searched from where two red coloured plastic pouches were found. When both the pouches were slightly opened from the corner side in the presence of the Panchas, a suspicious brown coloured solid substance was found to be there in both the pouches having pungent smell. Thereafter, when the accused was asked about the said suspicious narcotic substance, he admitted it to be the contraband substance hashish (Charas).
3.5 Thereafter, samples were taken and the officers of the FSL were also called for and upon testing with the drug detection kit, the samples tested positive for cannabis (Charas). When such contraband substance Charas recovered from the accused was weighed with the weighing scale, the same was found to be 2 KG and 173 Grams. Hence, the present FIR.
4. Learned advocate Mr. H.D. Rajput appearing for the applicant has submitted that the so-called incident has occurred in the evening of 22.09.2023, for which, FIR has been lodged on the very same day i.e. on 22.09.2023 and in connection with the same, the applicant has been arrested on 22.09.2023 and since then, he is i
The main legal point established in the judgment is the stringent conditions for granting bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, especially for offences involving commercial quantity of contraband su....
The court ruled that bail under the NDPS Act requires clear evidence of innocence and no likelihood of reoffending, emphasizing the serious nature of drug trafficking.
The judgment establishes the stringent parameters for granting bail under the NDPS Act, emphasizing the need to satisfy reasonable grounds for believing in the innocence of the accused and ensuring t....
The court denied bail under the NDPS Act due to the serious nature of drug trafficking charges and failure to meet statutory conditions, emphasizing public safety and legislative intent.
Bail denied in NDPS commercial quantity case as accused failed twin conditions of Section 37: no reasonable grounds to believe not guilty given prima facie conscious possession via concealment attemp....
Bail denied in NDPS commercial quantity case as vehicle owner prima facie in conscious possession of concealed charas absent explanation; twin conditions of Section 37 not satisfied – reasonable grou....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the stringent conditions for granting bail under the NDPS act, specifically under Section 37, which require reasonable grounds to believe that the ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.