DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Axis Nirman Industries Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Rajendra Kumar (HUF) – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)
1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 and 2 of the CPC, 1908 challenging the impugned judgment and decree dated 2nd June, 2022 passed by the learned ADJ (South District) Saket Court, New Delhi in CS/DJ No. 27 of 2022.
2. Vide the impugned order, the learned ADJ (South District) Saket Court, New Delhi, allowed the application under Order XII Rule 6 read with Section 151 CPC of the respondent/plaintiff (landlord) and inter alia passed a preliminary decree in favour of the respondent/plaintiff and directed the petitioner/defendant to hand over the vacant and peaceful possession of the suit property bearing House No. F-25A, Hauz Khas Enclave, New Delhi, admeasuring about 500 sq.yds. comprising Ground Floor, First Floor and Second Floor consisting of seven bedrooms with attached bathroom, two drawing rooms, two kitchens, four servant quarters etc. within a period of two weeks from today.
3. Before this Court proceeds further, it is necessary to record certain undisputed facts. A lease deed was entered into between the parties on 20th January, 2010 which was duly registered for the lease of premises up
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.