SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 2022

C. HARI SHANKAR
Ruchika Puglani – Appellant
Versus
Aasna Digin – Respondent


JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The impugned order dated 15th February 2022, passed by the learned Additional Senior Civil Judge ("the learned ASCJ"), invokes Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) to stay the trial in CS SCJ 1421/2021 (Ruchika Puglani v. Aasna Digin) pending the outcome of CS ADJ DJ 482/2021, (Aasna Digin v. Pawan Hans Taheem). Ruchika Puglani, the petitioner before me, is the plaintiff in CS SCJ 1421/2021 (the trial in which has been stayed) and Defendant 2 in CS ADJ DJ 482/2021.

Facts

CS ADJ DJ 482/2021

2. CS ADJ DJ 482/2021 was instituted by the respondent Aasna Digin ("Aasna") against Pawan Hans Taheem ("Pawan") and Ruchika Puglani ("Ruchika") who are husband and wife. Ruchika is the petitioner in the present petition.

3. Aasna claimed, in the plaint in CS ADJ DJ 482/2021, to be the landlord of Pawan and Ruchika in respect of the premises situated at 70/18, Second Floor, B Side, B-1 Extension, Sewak Park, Uttam Nagar, Delhi 110059 (hereinafter "the suit property"). It was claimed that Aasna had let out the said premises to Pawan and Ruchika vide lease deed dated 13th April 2019 for a period of 11 months at a fixed monthly rent of Rs.11,000/-. The period of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top