JUDGMENT

1. Both these petitions have been instituted under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, and challenge orders passed by the learned Arbitral Tribunal, functioning under the aegis of the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) and in seisin of the disputes between the parties before me. CM (M) 1140/2022 challenges Procedural Order No.10 dated 11th October 2022, which allows an application by Amazon.Com NV Investment Holdings LLC ("Amazon", hereinafter) to supplement the Statement of Claim (SOC) initially filed by it in the arbitral proceedings. CM (M) 1141/2022 assails order dated 28th June 2022, whereby an application, by the petitioners and Respondent 2, seeking termination of the arbitral proceedings under Section 32(2)(c)¹ of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("the 1996 Act") has been rejected.

2. The memo of parties in both these petitions is identical. The petitioners are Future Coupons Pvt. Ltd. (FCL), Future Coupons Resources Pvt. Ltd. (FRL), Akar Estate and Finance Pvt. Ltd. and the Directors of FCL who would, hereinafter, be referred to as "the Biyanis".

3. The orders under challenge are interlocutory in nature. They do not bring, to an