IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MINI PUSHKARNA, J.
Jagvir Singh Rana – Appellant
Versus
SDM/RA (Model Town) Delhi & Ors - Respondents
W.P.(C) 14851 of 2022
Decided on : 16-03-2023
Land Revenue Act - Mutation of Names - The court directed the Sub Divisional Magistrate to decide the case under Section 23 of the Delhi Land Revenue Act, 1954 expeditiously.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought directions for the Sub Divisional Magistrate to decide and pass final order in a case regarding mutation of names under Section 23 of the Delhi Land Revenue Act, 1954.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the Sub Divisional Magistrate to hear the case on the next listed date and to decide the case expeditiously by a specified date.
Issues: Delay in deciding the mutation of names case under Section 23 of the Delhi Land Revenue Act, 1954.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for expeditious decision-making in cases related to mutation of names under the Delhi Land Revenue Act, 1954.
Final Decision: The court disposed of the writ petition, directing the Sub Divisional Magistrate to decide the case expeditiously on or before a specified date.
JUDGMENT :
MINI PUSHKARNA, J.
1. The present writ petition has been filed with prayer for directions to respondent no. 1 Sub Divisional Magistrate (SDM)/Revenue Assistant (RA) (Model Town), Delhi to decide and pass final order and judgment in case no. 1554/RA/ALP/2018 titled as Jagbir Singh Rana & Ors. Vs. Devender Kumar & Anr., under Section 23 of Delhi Land Revenue Act, 1954 (DLR Act).
2. It is the case on behalf of the petitioner that during the consolidation proceedings, in lieu of agricultural lands owned by his father, the father of the petitioner was allotted agricultural lands elsewhere falling under Khasra Nos. 95/11 min (3-11), 12(4-0), 13/1(0-18), 19//20/1 (5-10), 30(0-14), 94/15/2 (0-2), situated within the revenue estate of Village Alipur, Delhi. The father of the petitioner was also allotted two residential plots falling under Khasra No. 272(1- 16), 273 min (1-0) situated within the revenue estate of Village Alipur, Delhi.
3. It is submitted that since the date of allotment and till his demise, the father of petitioner and thereafter his LR’s have remained in possession of the said land and have never sold the lands.
4. It is submitted that father of the petitioner expired on 03.04.2012. After his demise all his movable and immovable assets and property devolved upon his LR’s i.e. the petitioner, his widow, his two brothers and three married sisters.
5. Subsequently, reference under Section 23 of the Delhi Land Revenue Act, 1954 for mutation of names of the LRs of deceased father of the petitioner came to be sent by the Tehsildar to the Court of Learned SDM/RA, Alipur, Delhi, out of which the instant petition emanates.
6. It is submitted that notices in the said case were issued to the petitioner and to two of his brothers as well respondent no.3. However, despite pendency of the said case since a long time, the said reference under Section 23 of the DLR Act has not come to be decided.
7. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that the said application under Section 23 of the DLR Act is being considered by the concerned SDM and that the matter is now listed before the said authority on 11.04.2023. He, thus, submits that the matter will be heard on the next date fixed before the said authority and the matter shall be decided expeditiously.
8. In view thereof, it is directed that the matter shall be heard by the learned SDM/RA, Model Town on 11.04.2023, when the matter is stated to be next listed before the said authority.
9. Further, it is directed that the case no. 1554/RA/ALP/2018 titled as Jagbir Singh Rana & Ors. Vs. Devender Kumar & Anr., under Section 23 of Delhi Land Revenue Act, 1954 shall be decided by the said authority expeditiously on or before 31.05.2023.
10. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition is disposed of.
The need for expeditious decision-making in mutation of names cases under the Delhi Land Revenue Act, 1954.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that an appeal filed against a deceased person is not maintainable and is a nullity. The court also emphasized the importance of due diligence and ....
The Board of Revenue improperly set aside the Tehsildar's decision regarding land succession rights, failing to respect established jurisdictional boundaries.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the jurisdiction and applicability of legal provisions governing mutation proceedings, particularly in the context of land falling within the terri....
The court emphasized the importance of adjudicating upon the petitioner's application for correction of revenue entries and granted the petitioner liberty to seek mutation of the land.
Once a notification is published under the Delhi Development Act, 1957, the provisions of the DLR Act cease to apply, and any proceedings under the DLR Act after urbanization are without jurisdiction....
The court upheld the legality of mutation under Section 121 of the Land Revenue Act and emphasized the importance of proper authority in attesting mutations.
Once an area has been urbanised, the provisions of the DLR Act cease to apply to the said area, and any proceedings pending under the DLR Act after urbanisation of an area in question cannot continue....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.