Back
GAURANG KANTH
SUBHASH CHAND JAIN – Appellant
Versus
SAVITA DEVI – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
GAURANG KANTH, J.
C.M. APPL. No. 11264/2023
1. The Appellants (Original Defendants) are aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree dated 04.12.2021 (“Impugned Judgment”) passed by the ADJ-01, Shahdara, Karkardooma, Delhi in C.S. No. 670/2020 titled as Savita Devi and Another vs. Subhash Chand Jain and Another.
2. Vide the Impugned Judgment, the learned Trial Court was pleased to allow the Applications filed by the Respondents (Original Plaintiffs) under (i) Order XXXIX Rule 10 CPC and (ii) Order XII Rule 6 CPC. While allowing the said Applications, the learned Trial Court, vide the Impugned Judgment, was pleased to hold that the Respondents are entitled to decree of possession and accordingly directed the Appellants to hand over vacant and peaceful possession of the shop on the ground floor portion as well as the basement below the said shop of the property bearing No. X-3998-A, Gali No. 14, Shanti Mohalla, Gandhi Nagar, Delhi-110031 (“Suit Property”) to the Respondents. Learned Trial Court further directed the Appellants to pay the admitted rent @ Rs. 40,000/- (Rs. 25,000/- for the ground floor and Rs. 15,000/- for the basement) per month to the Respondents from the date of filin
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's reliance on the appellants' admissions regarding the landlord-tenant relationship, liability to pay rent, and termination of tenancy.
Admissions in legal pleadings must be clear and unequivocal to grant a judgment under Order XII Rule 6 CPC; otherwise, issues must proceed to trial.
Clear and unambiguous admissions by the defendant in a suit for possession can warrant a judgment on admission under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC. The expiration of a lease by efflux of time does not amount t....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for clear, unambiguous, and unconditional admissions to exercise the discretion under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, and the parameters for ....
Landlords are entitled to claim arrears of rent deposited by a subtenant, as the tenancy was properly terminated, and the claim is within the limitation period.
Landlord can obtain possession of premises upon clear admissions about tenancy relations and formal lease termination, regardless of tenant's claims of extensions based on rent acceptance.
The main legal point established is that admissions by a party can determine the outcome of a case, and dilatory tactics may lead to reduced costs and dismissal of claims.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the significance of clear and unequivocal admissions in pleadings, the application of Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and th....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
