IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
Jayanti Devi - Petitioner
Versus
Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Others – Respondents
W.P.(C) No. 1654 Of 2023, CM Appl. No. 8230 Of 2023, 8231 Of 2023 And W.P.(C) No. 1860 Of 2023 and CM Appl. No.7126 Of 2023
Decided On : 02-05-2023
Eviction - Delhi Slum & JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015 - [WP(C) 1654/2023, WP(C) 1860/2023] - Delhi Slum & JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015 (Policy) - The court discussed the provisions of the Delhi Slum & JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015 and emphasized the requirement for jhuggi clusters to be duly notified for stay on demolition to be feasible. The court also highlighted the need for rehabilitation policy to protect the right to shelter for those facing eviction, and the responsibility of the authorities to provide alternative accommodation before demolition.
Fact of the Case:
The Petitioners challenged eviction notices issued by the Public Works Department, seeking stay of demolition and rehabilitation under the Delhi Slum & JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015. The court considered the status of the jhuggi clusters and the entitlement to rehabilitation.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Petitioners' jhuggis were not part of the recognized Basti and therefore not entitled to rehabilitation under the Policy. However, the court directed the authorities to provide alternative accommodation in a shelter home before demolition.
Issues: Clarity on the status of the jhuggi clusters, entitlement to rehabilitation, and the responsibility of the authorities before demolition.
Ratio Decidendi: The main legal point established is that unless a jhuggi is part of the recognized cluster of the Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board, no rehabilitation can be directed. The court emphasized the need for alternative accommodation before demolition and the protection of the right to shelter for those facing eviction.
Final Decision: The Petitioners were given one month's time to move to the shelter home for temporary shelter before demolition. The petitions were disposed of accordingly.
JUDGMENT :
(Prathiba M. Singh, J.) :—
This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. In WP(C) 1654/2023, the Petitioner-Jayanti Devi is a resident of a jhuggi at Bhairon Marg in front of Gate No. 1, Pragati Maidan, New Delhi. She has filed the present writ petition challenging the impugned eviction notice bearing no. S 23 (ROAD)/S.B.A. MANDAL M-321/166 dated 28th January, 2023 issued by the Public Works Department (hereinafter ‘PWD’) which reads as under:
3. The case of the Petitioner is that she has been living in this jhuggi since 2012 and also has gas and electricity connections for the said premises. Even the voter ID card of the Petitioner is stated to have been issued to the Petitioner with the address of the said jhuggi.
4. Further it is the case of the Petitioner that, in terms of the Delhi Slum & JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015 (hereinafter ‘Policy’) dated 14th June, 2016, the Petitioner's jhuggi having come up before 1st January, 2015, the Petitioner is entitled to rehabilitation and the Petitioner ought not to be removed from the present place of occupation, that too without notice and hearing.
5. It is the case of the Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board (hereinafter ‘DUSIB’) that the Petitioner's jhuggi cluster does not belong to notified clusters, which are 675 and 82 in number. Reliance was placed upon the order passed by this court in W.P.(C) 1386/2023 titled ‘Kash Ram v. Public Works Department, GNCTD’ where the court had directed the demolition of jhuggis in the Dhaula Kuan area, subject to certain conditions.
6. The petition W.P(C) 1654/2023 was listed on 10th February, 2023 on which date, after hearing the parties, the following order was passed. The operative portion of the said order is set out below.
8. This position of law has recently been reiterated by this Court in Shakarpur Slum Union v. DDA, [W.P.(C) 6779/2021, decision dated 2nd August, 2022,] wherein the Court held as under:
“37. This Court while dealing with Ajay Maken (supra) and Sudama Singh (supra) never gave any licence to any person to encroach upon Government property. However, this Court is dealing with a human problem and right to shelter has been described as right which has to be protected by Courts especially for those who will have no place to go with their family and belongings if they are faced with mid-night demolitions. In order to ameliorate the human problem, this Court in Sudama Singh (supra) had directed that the State Government must formulate a comprehensive protocol to ensure that persons who have encroached upon Government lands are not rendered shelter-less and, therefore, a rehabilitation policy has to be brought out to rehabilitate those persons. It was in pursuance of that judgment that DUSIB was made the nodal agency for rehabilitation of the persons living in JJ clusters. Parameters were laid down as to who would be entitled to the benefit of the DUSIB Policy. The judgment of this Court in Ajay Maken (supra) cannot be interpreted to mean clusters not identified by the DUSIB would be entitled to rehabilitation.
XXX
42. Resultantly, the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the DDA to carry out further demolition only in consultation with the DUSIB. The DDA is further directed to give sufficient time to the dwellers to make alternate arrangements or, alternatively, steps should be taken to accommodate the dwellers in the shelters provided by the DUSIB
The main legal point established is that unless a jhuggi is part of the recognized cluster of the Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board, no rehabilitation can be directed.
The judgment established that for entitlement to protection/rehabilitation under the existing policy framework for rehabilitation of residents of Jhuggi-Jhopri in Delhi, the settlement must qualify a....
Failure to substantiate entitlement to rehabilitation under the Delhi Slum & JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015 results in denial of the benefit. However, authorities must provide temporar....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioner and other residents of the jhuggis were not entitled to rehabilitation as per the DUSIB policy, 2015, and the DUSIB Act, 2010. ....
The right to shelter and the need for a comprehensive protocol to ensure rehabilitation of persons living in JJ clusters.
Eligibility for rehabilitation under the 2015 Policy is contingent upon the notification of jhuggi jhopri basti by DUSIB and adherence to the cut-off dates for entitlement to rehabilitation.
The judgment established that under the Delhi Slum and JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015, residents must prove that their clusters were notified by DUSIB and that the jhuggis were constru....
Eligibility for rehabilitation or relocation under the Delhi Slum and JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015 is contingent upon the existence of jhuggi jhopri basti clusters before specific da....
Concealment of material facts and failure to comply with court directions can lead to the dismissal of a petition seeking rehabilitation and stay on demolition. Only the notified clusters as per the ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.