SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 817

PRATHIBA M. SINGH
Randheer – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Police – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Bibhuti Bhushan Mishra & Mr. Kailash Kumar, Advocates for Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate, for the Petitioners in W.P.(C) 11871/2022 and CM APPL. 35471/2022 and CONT.CAS(C) 730/2022 & CM APPL. 31018/2022.
Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Ms. Kritika Gupta and Mr. Arkaj Jain, Advocates, for R-1 in W.P.(C) 11871/2022 and CM APPL. 35471/2022.
Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC, GNCTD with Ms. Ayushi Bansal, Advocate & Sanyam Suri, Advocate, for R-1 to 4 in W.P.(C) 11871/2022 and CM APPL. 35471/2022.
Mr. Mohit Bhardwaj, Advocate, for R-4 & 5 in W.P.(C) 11871/2022 and CM APPL. 35471/2022.
Mr. Subhash Tanwar, CGSC with Mr. Ashish Choudhary, Advocate, for R-6 in W.P.(C) 11871/2022 and CM APPL. 35471/2022.
Mr. Parvinder Chauhan, Ms. Aakriti Garg, Advocates, for DUSIB in W.P.(C) 11871/2022 and CM APPL. 35471/2022.
Ms. Manika Tripathy (Standing Counsel for DDA), Ms. Kritika Gupta, Mr. Manish Vashist, Mr. Shubham Hasija, Mr. Varun Bhatnagar and Mr. Chirantan Saha, Advocates, for the Respondent in CONT.CAS(C) 730/2022 & CM APPL. 31018/2022.

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)

W.P.(C) 11871/2022 and CM APPL. 35471/2022 (Interim relief)

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The present petition has been filed by the occupants of jhuggies at T- Huts, Moolchand Basti-1, Rajghat, New Delhi- 110002 (`said premises'). They have filed this petition seeking rehabilitation and a stay on the demolition of their jhuggis till the pendency of the present writ petition.

3. Vide order dated 17th August, 2022, the court had recorded that the Petitioners had concealed material facts in this Petition. This included concealment of the relevant fact that the fathers of the eighteen Petitioners had instituted litigation in respect of the same property right up to the Supreme Court and lost.

4. Thereafter, vide order dated 11th November, 2022, the court had directed to issue bailable warrants against all the petitioners and ordered all the Petitioners to appear before the Court on the next date of hearing. The order dated 11th November, 2022 is as under:

    "1. On 17 August 2022, the Court had by a detailed order noted and come to conclude that the petitioners had clearly concealed material facts. It was in that backdrop tha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top