IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Anish Dayal, J.
Arun Kumar - Petitioner
Versus
Narcotics Control Bureau - Respondent
Bail Appln. 1700 of 2022
Decided On : 25-04-2023
NDPS Act - Regular Bail - Section 8, 20, 22(c), 23 & 29 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the admissibility of disclosure statements, CDR assessment, mobile messages, bank account statements, and tracking details of courier parcels under the NDPS Act. The judgment highlighted the standard for considering bail conditions under Section 37 NDPS and emphasized the need for reasonable grounds for a prima facie belief of innocence.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought regular bail in a case involving the illegal sale and export of psychotropic medicines under the NDPS Act. The prosecution relied on disclosure statements, CDR assessment, mobile messages, bank account statements, and tracking details of courier parcels to implicate the petitioner.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that there was no recovery from the petitioner, and the allegations against him were based on disclosure statements and indirect associations. It emphasized the need for reasonable grounds for a prima facie belief of innocence and granted bail to the petitioner due to the lack of material connecting him to the alleged offences.
Issues: The key issues included the admissibility of evidence such as disclosure statements, CDR assessment, mobile messages, bank account statements, and tracking details of courier parcels, and the standard for considering bail conditions under Section 37 NDPS.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the lack of direct evidence connecting the petitioner to the alleged offences and the application of the standard for considering bail conditions under Section 37 NDPS, which requires a reasonable satisfaction of the accused's potential innocence based on prima facie evidence.
Final Decision: The court granted bail to the petitioner on the grounds of reasonable belief in his potential innocence and the lack of material connecting him to the alleged offences.
JUDGMENT :
ANISH DAYAL, J.
By this petition, the regular bail is sought by the petitioner in Crime No. VIII/DZU/2019 under Section 8, 20, 22(c), 23 & 29 of NDPS Act.
2. As per the case of the prosecutrix, secret information was received on 06th July 2019 regarding one courier parcel booked by one Sudhir Srivastava to Amar Srivastava from Lucknow to USA lying at DTDC company office on the suspicion that it contains tablets in huge quantity and a team was constituted and on opening the parcels 500 strips of 10 Tablets Alprazolam were recovered total weight was found to be 1 k.g. Pursuant to details sought from the manufacturing company in Punjab, it was revealed that the said tablets had been sold to Psychocare Health Pvt. Ltd. and then to M/s. S.S. Medicos situated in U.P.
3. In November, 2019, S.S. Medicos, through Bhanu Pratap, admitted to the purchase of 20,000 tablets but failed to supply details of the stock of medicines as per license held by the company. Pursuant to several notices issued under Section 67 NDPS Act, Bhanu Pratap and his sister Shivangi Singh who was the licence holder for S.S. Medicos did not join investigation. NBW's were issued and finally Bhanu Pratap was interrogated, he disclosed that he had sold 20,000 tablets of Alprazolam to Manish Gupta without any bills. He was arrested on 05th December 2020. Notice was issued to Manish Gupta who was also located in Uttar Pradesh and consequent to his not joining the investigation, NBW's were issued. However, he joined the investigation subsequently.
4. Statement was recorded where he disclosed that he was involved in the illegal sale and purchase of medicines and had procured it from Bhanu Pratap. Out of the 20,000 Alprazolam tablets, 5000 were booked by him as per directions from Bhanu Pratap and the remaining 15,000 were sold by him to one Somdutt Singh whose mobile number was provided. Somdutt was found in Narela, Delhi and he tendered his statement pursuant to a notice served upon him under Section 67 NDPS Act on 07th April 2021,. Apparently, he disclosed that there were huge quantities of medicines lying at his flat at Sector 2, Narela, Delhi. A search was made of the said premises and 11,500 Tramadol Tablets, 750 Tramadol Tablets, 1500 Zolpidem Tablets, 400 Diazapam Tablets, were discovered along with other tablets.
5. Somdutt was arrested on 7th April 2021. Pursuant to another statement of Somdutt recorded on 8th April 2021, he apparently disclosed that these medicines were sent from Balia, U.P., to Anand Vihar through buses and then were illegally couriered abroad on the basis of fake IDs which were provided by Arun and Manish Kumar. He disclosed that he had sent pictures and messages in respect of 16-17 parcels to Arun Kumar and disclosed the address of Arun Kumar.
6. On 12th April 2021, notice was issued to Arun @ Varun (petitioner herein) who apparently disclosed his involvement in the export of psychotropic medicines. He also disclosed the involvement of Rex Ajmeria and Mausam involved in the illegal business of medicines. The petitioner was arrested on 12th April 2021. Somdutt apparently disclosed further through another statement that the drugs recovered from his rented house were brought by the petitioner in his Verna car. Pursuant to tracking details of parcels found in mobile belonging to Somdutt, investigation was carried out and it was found that parcels were exported to foreign countries but were lying at the Foreign Post Office, ITO. Said parcels were traced and a recovery of 8,000 Tramadol tablets and 9,000 Zolpidem tablets was made, which were later seized on 21st September 2021.
7. Pursuant to CDRs that were requisitioned, it became evident that accused petitioner was in touch with accused Somdutt. Further, unaccounted money has been found in the petitioner's bank account and a freezing order was passed which was confirmed by the Competent Authority.
8. An additional status report was filed by the NCB stating that details of money were found in h
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for reasonable grounds for a prima facie belief of innocence when considering bail conditions under Section 37 NDPS.
Point of Law : Before the Court grants bail to an accused allegedly involved in an offence under the NDPS Act, the Court required to be satisfied that the accused is not guilty of the offence and tha....
The court held that confession statements under the NDPS Act require corroborative evidence, and prolonged pre-trial detention with no contraband recovery justifies granting bail.
Before the Court grants bail to an accused allegedly involved in an offence under the NDPS Act, the Court required to be satisfied that the accused is not guilty of the offence and that he will not i....
The admissibility of recoveries made based on an accused person's disclosures, compliance with procedural requirements under the NDPS Act, and the relevance of electronic evidence such as WhatsApp ch....
Admissibility of evidence, commercial quantity of contraband, and likelihood of the applicant to commit similar offences while on bail.
The inadmissibility of confessions made to NDPS officers by the accused and the overriding of the statutory embargo created under Section 37 of the NDPS Act by the fundamental right guaranteed under ....
Corroborative evidence alone is insufficient for conviction under NDPS Act, necessitating substantial direct evidence; bail granted due to lengthy custody without conclusive evidence.
The court emphasized that under the NDPS Act, bail can only be granted if there are reasonable grounds for believing the accused is not guilty and unlikely to offend again, reaffirming the need for s....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.