ANISH DAYAL
Jumah Khan – Appellant
Versus
State Govt. of NCT Of Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANISH DAYAL, J.
1. By this petition, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in FIR No. 26 of 2014, registered at PS Special Cell under Sections 21/29 NDPS Act.
2. The facts as per the FIR are that pursuant to an information received on 23rd June 2014, that Afghan nationals residing at Lajpat Nagar, Arhar colony and other places in Delhi were running a macrodrug cartel, informants were deployed at various places to identify these drug traffickers. Based upon subsequent specific information that there would be a collection of consignment of drugs opposite Oberoi Hotel flyover, Delhi, and pursuant to information being conveyed to the ACP, a raid was directed to be conducted. The information was lodged vide DD No. 15 at 2.45 p.m. and submitted before the Inspector in charge in compliance with Section 42 NDPS Act. Subsequently, when the reading team reached the spot, opposite Oberoi Hotel flyover, they found a private Maruti car parked on Lodi Road near Amir Khushro Park. One person came on foot from the park along with a black and grey colour bag and stood near a streetlight pole and was identified by the informer as Jumah Khan, a resident of Afghanistan (the petitioner herein)
The Court established that an undertrial jailed for more than half the minimum sentence is eligible for bail due to delayed trial, emphasizing the right to personal liberty under Article 21.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the delay in trial and non-compliance of certain provisions of the NDPS Act can violate the constitutional rights of the accused under Article....
The court emphasized that prolonged detention without trial violates the accused's rights under Article 21, allowing bail if the accused has served over half of the maximum sentence under the NDPS Ac....
Prolonged pre-trial detention infringes on the right to personal liberty under Article 21, necessitating bail when an accused has languished in custody beyond half the maximum sentence duration.
The right to speedy trial and personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution must be upheld, and inordinate delay in trial can warrant the release of undertrial prisoners, as per the Supreme C....
Bail – Section 436-A of Cr.P.C. does not exclude offences under NDPS Act – Deprivation of personal liberty without ensuring speedy trial is not consistent with Article 21.
Prolonged incarceration without conviction violates the constitutional right to a speedy trial, warranting bail for undertrials as per established precedents.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.