Back
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
Puschpender S/o Shri Babu Lal (presently Confined In Central Jail No. 2, Tihar, New Delhi) – Appellant
Versus
Bhim Rao Ambedkar University Through Its Vice Chancellor Paliwal Park, Park Road, Agra, U. P: 282004 – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, J. (Oral)--The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking directions against respondent Nos.1 and 2 to allow him to appear in the re-examination of Labour Law paper of LL.B. Final Year scheduled in the year 2018. He also prayed for fixing the liabilities on respondent No.3 for deliberate and considerable delays resulting in depriving the petitioner to appear in LL.B. final year exam for the year 2013-14, despite the orders of his custody parole by the trial court. A further prayer for directions to respondent Nos.1 and 2 to re-evaluate the Labour laws answer booklet No. 7023009 dated 30.12.2016 is also made.
2. The case of the petitioner is that in May 2011, he took admission in LL.B. 1st year, in respondent No.2-Shri Jagdamba Law College (College) which is affiliated with respondent No.1-Dr. Bhim Rao Ambedkar University (University). According to him, in June 2012, he completed his 1st year and in June 2013, he completed his 2nd year of LL.B. course and he was promoted to LL.B. 3rd year. The petitioner was taken into Judicial Custody on 25.11.2019 in connection with criminal case registered against him. The petitioner could not appear in
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the number of opportunities for completing the LL.B. degree course cannot exceed the permissible opportunities as per the applicable rules and....
The judgment established the principle that students have a limited number of attempts within a specified span period to clear their LL.B courses, and they are not entitled to special examinations af....
The court found it unreasonable to deny the candidate the opportunity to complete the degree based solely on the span period rule and did not consider it appropriate to put the onus entirely upon the....
A university must provide personal communication regarding changes in examination schedules to avoid unfairly denying students their opportunity to complete their course.
A student who fails in required subjects is not entitled to progress to the final year of study, even under interim orders, unless eligibility criteria are met.
A detained student is entitled to re-admission to the LLB course without re-taking the entrance exam as per applicable regulations.
The judgment emphasizes the importance of specific challenges to notifications and the absence of vested rights for extra opportunities to clear examinations.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
