SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 2280

GAURANG KANTH
Naubat Ram Versus – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Power Co. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ms. Tripat Kaur Chawla, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Sujit Kr. Singh, Advocate, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Gaurang Kanth, J.

1. The case at hand is a Writ Petition preferred under Article 226/ 227 of the Constitution of India. The Petitioner in the present case is aggrieved by the Award dated 20.12.2002 passed by the Industrial Tribunal No. II in I.D. No. 17/1993 titled as The management of M/s Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking Shakti Bhawan, Nehru Place, New Delhi and Shri Naubat Ram through Delhi State Electricity Board Employees Union 626, Natra Neel Delhi (hereinafter referred to as "impugned award").

2. Vide the impugned award, learned Labour Court has held that a fair enquiry had been conducted against the Petitioner in which he had been found guilty of misappropriation of funds. Consequently, learned Labour Court, upheld the punishment imposed by the Disciplinary Authority and held that the Petitioner was not entitled for any relief from the learned Labour Court. Being aggrieved by the said decision, the Petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ thereby setting aside the impugned award.

FACTS RELEVANT FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF THE PRESENT WRIT PETITION ARE AS FOLLOWS:

3. The Petitioner, Shri Naubat Ram, had joi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top