SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 1829

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Jyoti Singh, J.
Ranjit Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Employees State Insurance Corporation – Respondent
W.P.(C) 5965 of 2019 & C.M. APPL. 25818 of 2019 & 8049 of 2020
Decided On : 31-01-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Anil Kumar Sahu, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Mr. V.K. Singh, Ms. Prachi Singh, Ms. Yakshi Rawal and Mr. Sourab Kumar, Advocates, for the Respondent.

The completion of the course rendered the question of extraordinary leave purely academic, leading to the petition being rendered infructuous.

Headnote:

Extraordinary Leave - Study Leave - The court found that the petitioner had completed the two-year course, rendering the petition infructuous. The question of extraordinary leave was deemed purely academic and no purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to quash the decision declining extraordinary leave for pursuing a postgraduate course in Ophthalmology and to direct the respondent to sanction the leave.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner had completed the two-year course, rendering the petition infructuous.

Issues: The issue was whether the petitioner should be granted extraordinary leave for pursuing the postgraduate course.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that since the petitioner had completed the course, no further order was required to be passed and the petition was rendered infructuous.

Final Decision: The writ petition was accordingly disposed of, and pending applications were also disposed of.

JUDGMENT

Jyoti Singh, J. (Oral)--Present writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner seeking the following reliefs:

    "i) Issue of writ of mandamus or writ order or direction in nature therefore quashing the impugned decision dated 16.05.2019 passed by Respondent whereby the respondent declined to grant extraordinary leave/study leave to the Petitioner for pursuing DNB Post Graduate Course (Post Diploma) Ophthalmology at Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Hospital, New Delhi and direct the Respondent to sanction the Extraordinary Leave of the Petitioner; and

    ii) Pass any other appropriate order or direction in favor of the petitioner and against the respondent, as per facts and circumstances of the case, and in the interests of justice."

2. Petitioner was appointed as a doctor with Respondent/ESIC on 16.09.2009. On 24.07.2015, study leave was sanctioned for two years from 08.06.2015 to 07.06.2017 for Diploma in Ophthalmology at RIMS, Ranchi, Jharkhand. Petitioner executed a three-year service bond of Rs.16,02,624/- on 27.07.2015 for proceeding on study leave. The condition of the bond was that in the event of failure to resume duty or resigning or retiring from service or otherwise quitting service, after completion of study leave or at any time within a period of five years after return to duty, Petitioner shall pay to ESIC on demand the aforesaid sum together with interest.

3. Petitioner rescheduled the study leave period and on 16.01.2017 study leave of the Petitioner was sanctioned by the Competent Authority for two years i.e. from 30.07.2015 to 29.07.2017. On 02.08.2017, Petitioner re-joined the ESI Hospital, Rohini after completion of his Diploma Course in Ophthalmology.

4. On 08.04.2019, Petitioner informed the Respondent about his attending online centralized counselling for DNB, Post Diploma, 2019. On 16.02.2019, Respondent issued a `No Objection Certificate' for appearing in the Examination i.e. PDCET-Dec 2018.

5. On 18.04.2019, Petitioner was informed by the National Board of Examinations that he had been allotted a seat in the First Round and accordingly on 20.04.2019, Petitioner requested the Respondent to grant him extraordinary leave for pursuing DNB (Post Diploma) in Ophthalmology at Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Hospital, New Delhi. Petitioner also transferred the requisite tuition fee on 21.04.2019, for the first year.

6. On 24.04.2019, Petitioner requested for two years extraordinary leave/study leave from 03.06.2019 to 01.06.2021 for pursuing the said course, however, the request was rejected on 16.05.2019 by the Respondent, despite having granted NOC earlier, for appearing in the counselling. This compelled the Petitioner to file the present writ petition seeking a direction to the Respondent to grant leave to the Petitioner for pursuing the Post Graduate course.

7. Vide order dated 27.05.2019, this Court stayed the impugned order dated 16.05.2019 whereby Petitioner's request for leave was declined and permitted the Petitioner to join the said course from 07.06.2019.

8. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that consequent upon the interim order granted by this Court, Petitioner joined the DNB Post Graduate Course (Post Diploma) Ophthalmology at Deen Dayal Hospital and has completed the two-year course, after which he has joined the concerned ESIC Hospital and is performing his duties and thus the writ petition has become infructuous.

9. This Court finds merit in the submission of the Petitioner that since the Petitioner has completed the two-year course, no further order is required to be passed and the petition is rendered infructuous. The question of extraordinary leave is now purely academic and no purpose will be served in keeping the writ petition pending.

10. Writ petition is accordingly disposed in the aforesaid terms. Pending applications also stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top