Back
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
Mohd. Rashid – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT of Delhi) – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Swarana Kanta Sharma, J. (Oral)--The present appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ("Cr.P.C.") has been filed by appellant against the judgment dated 08.10.2008 and order on sentence dated 13.12.2008 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi in case FIR bearing no. 323/2006, registered at Police Station R.K. Puram, New Delhi for offences punishable under Sections 398/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
2. The present appeal was admitted and the sentence of appellant was suspended vide order dated 16.01.2009 by this Court.
3. Briefly stated, the case of prosecution, before the learned Trial Court was that on the intervening night of 17/18.05.2006, complainant Anil Singh after dropping passenger at Dhaula Kaun was returning home in his vehicle (TSR) bearing No. DL-1RJ-037, when at around 11:45 PM, four boys signaled him to stop his vehicle. Upon boarding the vehicle, the accused persons asked the driver/complainant to go to Sector-8, R.K. Puram. Eventually, one of the accused Mustafa came on front seat and asked the complainant to stop the vehicle, while the other three accused sitting on the rear seat caught hold of him. Thereafter
The Court has the discretion to consider the age of the incident, the personal circumstances of the appellant, and the belated stage of the trial in deciding to reduce the sentence.
The court has the discretion to consider the circumstances of the case, including the duration of the trial and the appellant's current responsibilities, in deciding on the reduction of sentence.
The Court has the discretion to consider the circumstances and conduct of the appellant in reducing the sentence, especially in cases where a significant amount of time has passed since the incident.
The Court has the discretion to consider the prolonged trial period, the appellant's conduct, and his positive contribution to society after the conviction as grounds for reducing the sentence.
The court has the discretion to consider the overall facts and circumstances of the case, including the appellant's conduct and the belated stage of the trial, in deciding on the reduction of sentenc....
The Court may consider the appellant's conduct, contributions to society, and family responsibilities in reducing the sentence.
The Court has the discretion to consider the personal circumstances of the appellant and the belated stage of the trial in deciding to reduce the sentence without interfering with the conviction.
The court has the discretion to reduce the sentence based on the overall facts and circumstances of the case, especially considering the belated stage of the trial and the conduct of the appellant du....
The Court has the discretion to consider the appellant's family circumstances and the period of trial in deciding the suspension of sentence and imposing a further fine instead of further imprisonmen....
The court may consider the appellant's personal circumstances, including age and family responsibilities, in determining the appropriate sentence.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
