SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
Dinesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT of Delhi) – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Swarana Kanta Sharma, J. The present appeals under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ("Cr.P.C.") have been filed by appellants against the judgment dated 23.05.2009 and order on sentence dated 26.05.2009 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi in case FIR bearing no. 702/2005, registered at Police Station Dabri, New Delhi.
2. The above-captioned appeals were admitted and the sentences of appellants were suspended vide order dated 05.06.2009 by this Court.
3. Briefly stated, the case of prosecution, before the learned Trial Court, was that on 05.10.2005 at around 9:30 AM, when the complainant Bhagirath and his son Jaswant were passing by a store in Sagarpur to catch a bus for Paharganj, Delhi, two persons i.e. the appellants herein had come on a motorcycle, parked the same in front of the complainant, and had taken out an iron rod from the motorcycle and started hitting the complainant on his legs. As a result, the complainant had fallen down and when his son had made efforts to save the complainant, he too was hit on the head by the appellants with iron rod. It was further alleged that after hitting mercilessly, appellants h
The Court has the discretion to consider the prolonged trial period, the appellant's conduct, and his positive contribution to society after the conviction as grounds for reducing the sentence.
The Court has the discretion to consider the age of the incident, the personal circumstances of the appellant, and the belated stage of the trial in deciding to reduce the sentence.
The court has the discretion to consider the overall facts and circumstances of the case, including the appellant's conduct and the belated stage of the trial, in deciding on the reduction of sentenc....
The Court may consider the appellant's conduct, contributions to society, and family responsibilities in reducing the sentence.
The court has the discretion to consider the circumstances of the case, including the duration of the trial and the appellant's current responsibilities, in deciding on the reduction of sentence.
The Court has the discretion to consider the circumstances and conduct of the appellant in reducing the sentence, especially in cases where a significant amount of time has passed since the incident.
The court considered the circumstances and conduct of the appellant in deciding to reduce the sentence and enhance the compensation.
The court may consider the appellant's personal circumstances, including age and family responsibilities, in determining the appropriate sentence.
The Court has the discretion to consider the appellant's family circumstances and the period of trial in deciding the suspension of sentence and imposing a further fine instead of further imprisonmen....
The Court has the discretion to consider the personal circumstances of the appellant and the belated stage of the trial in deciding to reduce the sentence without interfering with the conviction.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.