C. HARI SHANKAR
Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha D/b/a Casio Computer Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Riddhi Siddhi Retail Venture – Respondent
ORDER (Oral)
C. Hari Shankar, J.
I.A. 13291/2022 (Order VIII Rule 1(3) of the CPC for placing documents on record)
1. By this application preferred under Order VIII Rule 1(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), the defendants seek to place certain additional documents on record. Following the decision in Sudhir Kumar @ S Baliyan v. Vinay Kumar G.B., 2021 SCC OnLine SC 734, the application is treated as having been preferred under Order XI Rule 1(10) of the CPC, as amended by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
2. Mr. Rishi Bansal, learned Counsel for the plaintiff initially opposed the application but, later, agreed to the documents being taken on record.
3. Accordingly, the application is allowed. The documents filed with the application are taken on record.
I.A. 12436/2022 (Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC) and I.A. 13344/2022(Order XXXIX Rule 4 of the CPC)
4. This case was originally pending before the learned Commercial Court and has subsequently been transferred to this Court. In I.A. 12436/2022 filed by the plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC, ad interim relief was granted by the Additional District Judge ('the learned ADJ') vide order dated 25th J
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.