Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
E.N. Project and Engineering Industries (P.) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
KVT Electrical Project and Engineering – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. prayers for vacation of injunction. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. plaintiffs allege design infringement. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. defendants challenge registration based on prior publication. (Para 7 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. onus shifts to challengers after registration. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. evaluation of prior publication evidence. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 6. assessment of the defendants' prior publication claims. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 7. explaining novelty and originality under the act. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 8. visual appeal as a test for originality. (Para 25 , 26) |
| 9. court's analysis of jurisdiction and conduct. (Para 27 , 28) |
| 10. defendants' failure to comply with equitable principles. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 11. dismissing the defendants' application. (Para 32 , 33) |
JUDGMENT
Manoj Kumar Ohri, J.
I.A. No. 1262/2021 (Under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC) & I.A. No. 1274/2021 (Under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC)
1. The Interlocutory Application bearing No. 1274/2021 has been filed under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC read with Section 151 CPC on behalf of the Defendants seeking vacation of the order dated 18.12.2019 passed by the Sessions Court granting ad-interim, ex-parte injunction against the Defendants in re
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
