IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manoj Kumar Ohri, J.
The New India Assurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Smt Kamla Devi & Ors. – Respondents
FAO 34 of 2023 and CM APPLS. 6748-49 of 2023
Decided On : 13-02-2023
Employees' Compensation Act - Death Compensation - 1923 - Summary: The court upheld the decision to allow the claim petition for death compensation under the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923. The appellant's arguments regarding the cause of death and the authenticity of the driving license were rejected based on legal precedents and the employer's due diligence in hiring the deceased. Acts and Sections: Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 - Section 30, Shrimati Bhagubai v. The General Manager, Central Railway - 1954 SCC OnLine Bom 10, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Ashwani Kumar & Ors. - 2014 SCC OnLine Del 281, Dushad Earth Mover v. National Insurance Company Ltd. & Ors. - 2013 SCC OnLine Del 2921
Fact of the Case:
The appellant challenged the order allowing a claim petition for death compensation under the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923, after the deceased, an employee, was murdered while driving a truck during the course of employment.
Finding of the Court:
The court upheld the decision to allow the claim petition, rejecting the appellant's arguments regarding the cause of death and the authenticity of the driving license.
Issues: The cause of death and the authenticity of the driving license were raised as grounds for the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on legal precedents to establish the causal connection between the accident and the employment, and the employer's due diligence in hiring the deceased, to reject the appellant's arguments.
Final Decision: The court upheld the impugned order and dismissed the appeal, directing the appellant to pay the compensation amount.
JUDGMENT
Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. (Oral)
1. By way of present appeal filed under Section 30 of the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923, the appellant has assailed order dated 06.12.2022 passed by the learned Commissioner, Employees' Compensation, Delhi in Case No. ECD/74/NW/2017/5127-29, whereby the claim petition filed by respondent Nos.1-2/claimants seeking death compensation was allowed.
2. As per the claim petition, Sh. Narender (deceased) was employed with respondent No.3 as a driver on truck bearing registration No.HR-63B-1107. On 11.05.2016, the deceased was directed to drive the aforesaid vehicle from Narwana to Delhi. On 12.05.2016, as per instructions, the deceased unloaded the goods at Narela and thereafter loaded plastic raisin/material from Noharbadra Transport, Bawana which was to be delivered at Narwana Village, Dhrodhi. However, en route on 14.05.2016 the deceased was found murdered. An FIR bearing No. 232/2016 was registered on 14.05.2016 at Bawana.
3. In view of the above facts, respondents No. 1 & 2 filed a claim petition before the learned Commissioner which was allowed. The learned Commissioner directed the appellant to deposit the compensation amount of Rs. 8,31,920/- alongwith simple interest @12% p.a. w.e.f. 14.05.2016 till the date of payment along with funeral expenses of Rs.5,000/-. Aggrieved by the impugned judgment/order, the appellant has filed the present appeal.
4. In the present appeal, the appellant has based its arguments on the following two grounds:
a) That the death of the deceased was caused by murder and not by accident occurred in course of employment while driving the insured vehicle, and
b) That the Driving License produced by respondent Nos.1 and 2 is fake and the same is against the policy conditions. Therefore, the insurer/appellant cannot be held liable to indemnify respondent No.3/employer. In this regard, reference was made to an RTI Reply, wherein the District Transport Authority stated that the details of Driving License No. 78679/TV/Z/2010 were not found in their records.
5. With regard to the question of liability of insurance company in case of murder, it is deemed expedient to advert to the decision in Shrimati Bhagubai v. The General Manager, Central Railway reported as 1954 SCC OnLine Bom 10, where a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court analysed circumstances under which a causal connection between employment of the deceased and his accident is established. It was observed as follows:
"...Now, it is clear that there must be a causal connection between the accident and the employment in order that the Court can say that the accident arose out of the employment of the deceased. It is equally clear that the cause contemplated is the proximate cause and not any remote cause. The authorities have clearly laid down that if the employee in the course of his employment has to be in a particular place and by reason of his being in that particular place he has to face a peril and the accident is caused by reason of that peril which he has to face, then a causal connection is established between the accident and the employment. It is now well settled that the fact that the employee shares that peril with other members of the public is an irrelevant consideration. It is true that the peril which he faces must not be something personal to him; the peril must be incidental to his employment. It is also clear that he must not by his own act add to the peril or extend the peril. But if the peril which he faces has nothing to do with his own action or his own conduct, but it is a peril which would have been faced by any other employee or any other member of the public, then if the accident arises out of such peril, a causal connection is established between the employment and the accident. In this particular case what is established is that the employee while in the course of his employment found himself in a spot where he was assaulted and stabbed to death. He was in the place where he wa
The central legal point established is the requirement to establish a causal connection between the accident and the employment, and the employer's duty to take all due care in appointing the driver.
An employer is liable for compensation under the Employees' Compensation Act even if the employee was negligent or held a fake driving license, provided the accident occurred in the course of employm....
The central legal point established is the requirement of proving a causal connection between the accident and employment under Section 3(1) of the 1923 Act.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of proving the employer-employee relationship and the occurrence of the accident during the course of employment, along with the ....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the driving license status of the deceased did not absolve the employer or the Insurance Company from liability to pay compensation under t....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.