SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 2928

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Raghav Goel – Appellant
Versus
Rachna Prothi – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Akhil Mittal, Advocate, for the Appellant.
Mr. N.K. Kantawala, Advocate, for the Respondent No.1.

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. (Oral)

1. By way of the present appeal filed under Order 43 Rule 1 CPC, the appellant/defendant has assailed order dated 08.02.2021 and clarification order dated 17.11.2021 passed by the learned ADJ-01, South District, Saket Courts in CS No.448/2020.

2. Vide impugned order dated 08.02.2021, an application filed by respondent No.1/plaintiff under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC was allowed and the appellant restrained from blocking the front entrance of property bearing No.27, Community Centre, Saket, New Delhi (hereinafter, the `suit property') by carrying out any construction, till the disposal of the suit. The appellant filed an application seeking clarification of order dated 08.02.2021 and the same came to be disposed of vide the clarification order dated 17.11.2021.

3. Initially, leasehold rights of the suit property were granted by DDA in favour of M/s Supernal Corrugation (India) Ltd. vide lease deed dated 21.07.2000. Statedly, after obtaining sanctioned building plan from DDA in the year 1985, the construction was carried out. In the year 2005, the conversion of the suit property into freehold was permitted. After changing multiple hands, the suit p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top