Back
NAVIN CHAWLA
Aruna Bakshi – Appellant
Versus
Devender Kumar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Navin Chawla, J. (Oral)
1. This suit has been filed by the plaintiff inter alia praying for the partition of the property bearing No.12-D, Old Gupta Colony, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the "suit property").
2. It is the case of the plaintiff that the suit property was the self- acquired property of the father of the plaintiff Late Sh. Mohan Lal Oberoi, who passed away intestate on 28.11.2004 at Delhi, leaving behind his legal heirs, that is, his wife Smt. Pushpa Rani, the plaintiff, the defendant nos.1 to 3, and the defendant nos.4 to 6 (who in turn are the legal heirs of Smt. Veena Grover, the deceased daughter of Late Sh. Mohan Lal Oberoi and Smt. Pushpa Rani). Smt. Pushpa Rani also passed away intestate on 19.10.2014 at Delhi.
3. The plaintiff asserts that the said property was purchased by Late Sh. Mohan Lal Oberoi by way of registered Sale Deed dated 20.08.1957. The construction over the said property was also done by Late Sh. Mohan Lal Oberoi. In view of the above, the plaintiff claimed 1/5th share in the suit property.
4. In the written statement filed by the defendant no.1, the defendant no.1 has set up a case that Mr.Malik Shah, the grandfather of the pla
The main legal point established is the requirement for clear documentary evidence and detailed factual references to establish HUF property, as well as the presumption that every Hindu family is joi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that in order to claim a share in ancestral properties as part of an HUF, it is necessary to provide specific factual details of the creation or ex....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for clear pleadings and necessary averments for the existence of joint Hindu family/HUF properties, and the court's wide discretion....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the plaintiffs must establish the existence of a cause of action and entitlement to seek the reliefs as sought in the plaint. Failure to do so....
A joint Hindu family property remains joint unless proven otherwise; the burden of proof lies on the party claiming separate ownership, requiring credible evidence.
The property would form the individual property of the person who derives the same under the partition.
The burden of proof lies on the party alleging joint family property to establish the property's connection to the ancestral property, as per Hindu law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
