PRATHIBA M. SINGH
Narender Hooda – Appellant
Versus
Competent Authority – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
CM APPL. 36306/2022 (for impleadment) in W.P.(C) 6724/2022
2. This is an application moved on behalf of Mr. Parijat Sinha, Advocate who claims to own the north portion of Space No. 5 in the stilt area of the Front Side/Block of Sagar Apartments'. His submission is that his interest would be adversely affected by the directions passed in these cases. Accordingly, he is impleaded as Respondent No. 4.
3. Let an amended memo of parties be filed within a week.
4. Application is disposed of. All contentions are left open.
CM APPL. 18016/2020 (for amendment of the prayer vol. 2) in W.P.(C) 3295/2020
5. This is an application seeking amendment of the prayer in the writ petition. The submission of Mr. Hooda, ld. Counsel is that the Petitioner primarily wished to submit before the Court that instead of any specific association, one association ought to be recognised for collecting maintenance charges and for running the management and administration of Sagar Apartments.
6. List on 18th April, 2023
CM APPL. 46418/2021 (for clarification) in W.P.(C) 3295/2020
7. This is an application seeking clarificat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.