SANJEEV NARULA
Bishwajeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
Bikramjit Singh Through Lrs. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Narula, J.
THE CONTROVERSY ON MAINTAINABILITY
1. The present execution proceedings under Order 21 Rule 11 of CPC arise from final judgment and decree1[The formal decree has not been drawn up as yet, thus last paragraph of the judgment is treated as a decree, in light of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Sir Sobha Singh and Sons Pvt. Ltd. v. Shashi Mohan Kapur (deceased through L.R.) in C.A. No. 534/2019. The reference to the word "decree" in the judgment is to be read accordingly.] dated 01st October, 2007 [hereinafter, `Decree'] deciding a suit for partition of property bearing No. 54, Friends Colony East, New Delhi-110065, admeasuring 3860 sq. yards [hereinafter, `suit property']. As per the Decree, the suit property has to be auctioned and sale proceeds have to be apportioned among the parties, as per their respective shares.
2. For convenience, the parties to this execution petition and their respective shares are noted below:
| Party in execution proceeding | Name/Description | Party in civil proceeding | Share of suit property |
| Decree Holder No. 1["DH-1"] | Bishwajeet Singh | Plaintiff in civil suit. | 1/4th share |
| Decree Holder No. 2-3 | Legal Representatives [hereinafter,, ` | ||
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.