Back
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Manraj Enterprises – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
ORDER
Chandra Dhari Singh, J. (Oral)
1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act, 1996") seeking redressal of disputes arising between the parties qua the General Conditions of Contract.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a registered Partnership Firm that offers its numerous services (often linked to energy) under contract to various organisations, including Ministries and Departments of the Government of India.
3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the respondent invited tender for the execution of work named and styled as "OHE modification works in connection with (A) Removal of PSR-120 KMPH at Ballabhgarh (Delhi end) (B) Easing of turnouts at Tilak Bridge (C) Limited height subway at Km 68/3-4on ROK-ABO section of Delhi Division".
4. It is further submitted that the petitioner responded to the request for tender by submitting a bid for the project on 24thJuly, 2014 which was accepted by the respondent vide its letter of intent (LOI) No. 230-Elect/TRD/2011/1/(High Speed) dated 13thAugust, 2014, foll
The main legal point established is the arbitrability of disputes under the construction contract and the court's authority to appoint a sole arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to appoint a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising under a contract, in accordance with the Arbitration and Concilia....
The court's decision emphasized the arbitrability of disputes and the appointment of a sole arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
The court upheld the validity of the arbitration agreement and recognized the petitioner’s adherence to the procedural requirements for arbitration, irrespective of the respondent's claims regarding ....
The court applied the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to appoint a sole arbitrator and ensure compliance before commencing the arbitration.
Parties with an arbitration clause must resolve disputes through arbitration, as established in the contract terms.
The failure to constitute a Dispute Resolution Board justifies the appointment of an Arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, affirming the need for timely resolution of disputes arisin....
The court has the authority to appoint a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from a contract, ensuring compliance with the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
Disputes under contracts with the Union of India are arbitrable, and the appointment of an independent arbitrator is necessary for their resolution under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Concilia....
The main legal principle established is the appointment of a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve disputes arising from a Tender Agreement.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
