CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Valley Telegence Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Rah Infotech Private Ltd. – Respondent
ORDER
Chandra Dhari Singh, J. (Oral)
1. The instant petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed on behalf of petitioner seeking the following reliefs:
"a. Appoint Retd. Justice Sh. Kailash Gambhir, HMJ, High Court of Delhi as the Sole Arbitrator as per Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996; and
b. Direct that costs of the proceedings be awarded in favor of the Petitioner; and
c. Pass such other and further order(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and appropriate for the proper adjudication of this case in the favor of the Petitioner and against the Respondent."
2. The Petitioner is a Telecom Group working in VAS Infrastructure and Applications catering to requirements across technologies like GSM, CDMA, 4G/LTE, & Enterprise mobile apps in the Indian and APAC Market. It is engaged in the business of providing Telecom Solutions, IT Services, Enterprise Applications, Solution Designing and Development, Mobile Applications, Wi-Fi Monetization & Management Solutions, Data Processing, E-Governance Applications, System Integration and Consultancy Services and carrying out end-to-end application development and management of the sys
The court emphasized the arbitrability of disputes and the appointment of a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
The court's authority to appoint a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
The court's decision emphasized the arbitrability of disputes and the appointment of a sole arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Premature petitions under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, are not maintainable when a Sole Arbitrator has already been appointed, and unresponsiveness of the current Arbitra....
The importance of fulfilling necessary requisites for appointment of an arbitrator under the Arbitration Act and the spirit of the Act to make the resolution process accessible, easier, and more effi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to appoint a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between parties when there is an agreement to refer the disputes to arbit....
The court can appoint an Arbitrator when parties fail to mutually agree, as per agreement provisions and arbitration law.
The main legal principle established in the judgment is the court's authority to appoint a Sole Arbitrator and refer disputes arising from a tender to Arbitration in accordance with the provisions of....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to refer disputes to arbitration when both parties have invoked the arbitration clause and there are admitted arbitral disput....
The court's decision emphasizes the importance of referring disputes to arbitration in accordance with the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.