IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Rail Dawa Bar Association, Lucknow – Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 11835 of 2022 and CM APPL. 35298 of 2022
Decided On : 03-03-2023
Writ Petition - Appointment of Chairman, Railway Claims Tribunal - Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal and Other Authorities (Qualifications, Experience and other Conditions of Service of Members) Rules, 2017, Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021 - The petition challenged the reappointment of the Chairman of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Delhi. The Court analyzed the eligibility and procedure for the appointment of the Chairman, finding that the appointment process was in accordance with the applicable Act and Rules. The Court dismissed the petition, imposing costs on the Petitioner for filing a mala fide petition and attempting to vilify the Tribunal and its Chairman without reasonable basis.
Fact of the Case:
The petition challenged the reappointment of the Chairman of the Railway Claims Tribunal, alleging that the appointment process was not followed and the proper procedure was not adhered to. The Petitioner also raised objections regarding the jurisdiction of the Single Judge Bench of the High Court to hear the petition.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the appointment process was in accordance with the applicable Act and Rules. The Court dismissed the petition, stating that the entire attempt in the petition was to raise aspersions against the duly constituted Tribunal. The Court also imposed costs on the Petitioner for filing a mala fide petition and attempting to vilify the Tribunal and its Chairman without reasonable basis.
Issues: The issues raised in the case included the eligibility and procedure for the appointment of the Chairman, the jurisdiction of the Single Judge Bench to hear the petition, and the allegations of mala fide intent and vilification of the Tribunal and its Chairman.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court's decision was based on the finding that the appointment process was conducted in accordance with the applicable Act and Rules, and that the petition was filed with mala fide intent to vilify the Tribunal and its Chairman without reasonable basis.
Final Decision: The Court dismissed the petition challenging the reappointment of the Chairman of the Railway Claims Tribunal, imposed costs on the Petitioner, and disposed of the case.
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh(Oral)
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. The present petition has been filed by the Rail Dawa Bar Association, Lucknow, through its Secretary against the Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 3 i.e., Union of India, Railway Board, and the present incumbent/Chairman Railways Claims Tribunal, respectively. The petition seeks the following prayers:
"a) A writ of certiorari calling the entire official records from Respondents leading to the decision to again appoint Mr. Justice (Retd.) K.S. Ahluwalia (Respondent No. 3) as the Chairman, Railway Claims Tribunal, New Delhi.
b) An appropriate writ, order, direction and/or declaration in the nature of certiorari/mandamus quashing and setting aside the impugned decision to again appoint Mr. Justice (Retd.) K.S. Ahluwalia(Respondent No. 3) as the Chairman, Railway Claims Tribunal, New Delhi;
c) writ of mandamus directing the Respondent to immediately frame, rules/regulations laying down a fair and transparent selection procedure for appointment to the posts of Chairman, Vice Chairman (Judicial), Vice Chairman (Technical), Member (Judicial) and Members (Technical) in Railway Claims Tribunal i.e., which are posts of public importance in a quasi judicial authority.
d) An appropriate writ, order, direction in the nature of prohibition restraining the Respondent from again offering appointment to Mr. Justice (Retd.) K.S. Ahluwalia (Respondent No. 3) to the post of Chairman, Railway Claims Tribunal, Delhi;
e) Any other writ, order or direction which may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice."
3. The matter was first listed on 8th August 2022 when the Ld. ASG appearing for the UOI was asked to obtain instructions with respect to the allegations raised in the writ petition. Initially, an application was filed seeking stay of the proposal to appoint Respondent no.3 as the Chairman, Railway Claims Tribunal. The said application was dismissed on 5th September, 2022, with the following observations:
" The Court finds no ground to grant the prayers as raised in the present application which seeks the operation of the order dated 01 September 2022 being placed in abeyance for the reason that the matter has already been entertained and the respondents had been duly asked to obtain instructions with respect to the challenge raised in the writ petition. Any steps that the respondents may have taken in the meanwhile and during the pendency of the present writ petition would in any case abide by its final result.
Consequently, and subject to the aforesaid observation, this application shall stand dismissed."
4. Thereafter, on 13th January, 2023, the following order was passed:
"1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. This is a petition challenging the re-appointment of the Chairman of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Delhi.
3. Mr. Chetan Sharma, ld. ASG submits that the appointment of Respondent No. 3 as the Chairman of the Railway Claims Tribunal has been made in accordance with the prescribed procedures.
4. The ld. ASG submits that insofar as prayer (c) of the petition is concerned, the Rules already exist for the conditions of service and the manner of selection of Chairman, Vice Chairman and other members of the Railway Claims Tribunal. The said prayer reads as:
"c) writ of mandamus directing the Respondent to immediately frame, rules/regulations laying down a fair and transparent selection procedure for appointment to the posts of Chairman, Vice Chairman (Judicial), Vice Chairman (Technical), Member (Judicial) and Members (Technical) in Railway Claims Tribunal i.e., which are posts of public importance in a quasi judicial authority."
5. Let an affidavit along with all necessary documents be placed on record by the next date of hearing.
6. List on 7th February, 2023."
5. Pursuant to the above order, an affidavit has been filed by the Union of India deposed by the Under Secretary, Ministry of Railways. A rejoind
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of adjudicatory experience and the role of the Search-cum-Selection Committee in making recommendations for the appointment of the C....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for judicial dominance in the Selection Committee and the need to maintain the judicial primacy over the appointment process for th....
The inclusion of a biased committee member in a selection process violates natural justice, resulting in a decision being set aside due to reasonable apprehensions of bias.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.