Back
R. I. CHAGLA
Pidilite Industries Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Dubond Products India Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. trademark rights and history of usage. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. injunction sought against trademark infringement by the defendant. (Para 5) |
| 3. plaintiff claims prior use of trademark leading to goodwill accrual. (Para 12 , 18) |
| 4. claim of trademark infringement and evidence. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. defendant's claims of prior use and evidence. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 6. court's observations regarding trademark comparison. (Para 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75) |
| 7. establishing likelihood of confusion. (Para 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80) |
| 8. interim injunction and relief. (Para 102 , 103 , 104) |
ORDER
R.I. Chagla, J. - By this Interim Application, the Applicant / Plaintiff is seeking an order of injunction restraining the Defendant from infringing the Plaintiffs LW and LW+ registered trademarks and for which necessary relief has been sought viz. for injunction restraining infringement of trademark, copyright and passing off of the Plaintiff's registered Trade Marks by the impugned marks of the Defendant viz. LW with or without the marks HYDROBUILD or HYDROTITE and / or Power and the impugned labels referred to in the Plaint as impugned marks / labels.
2. The
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
