Back
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
Ranjan Kumar S/o Manoj Paswan – Appellant
Versus
University of Delhi, Through Its Registrar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, J. (Oral)--Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner prays for the following reliefs:
"a. Call for the records including the notifications/circulars/executive instructions of the Respondents apropos the conduct of the Annual Examinations of March/April to the Faculty of Law, University of Delhi vide which an opportunity to sit for the examinations was denied for the Petitioners and the like and issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction or order for quashing the same as illegal, arbitrary, capricious, discriminatory and malicious and as ultra vires the due process of law and in violation of the statutory provisions of the University of Delhi and Articles-14,19 and 21 of the Constitution of India also the precedents laid down by the Hon'ble Courts from time to time and/or;
b. Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction or order to direct the Respondents to allow the Petitioners and the like who pursued the LLB course after 2015-26 from the Faculty of Law to sit for the arrear papers during the Annual examination session of March/April 2023 and/or;
c. Pass any othe
The judgment established the principle that students have a limited number of attempts within a specified span period to clear their LL.B courses, and they are not entitled to special examinations af....
The court emphasizes the need for timely issuance of examination schedules by universities while respecting their autonomy in academic matters.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the number of opportunities for completing the LL.B. degree course cannot exceed the permissible opportunities as per the applicable rules and....
University may permit LL.B. redo candidates to write exams under exceptional N+2+1 extension upon document submission.
The court determined that the university's denial of examination permission based on attendance was arbitrary, emphasizing the need for adherence to judicial directives and consideration of individua....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
