SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 792

PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
Kumar Shailender S/o Ganesh Dutt Ravi Shankar – Appellant
Versus
University Grants Commission, Through Its Chairman – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ms. Himani Bhatnagar, Advocate, for the Petitioner in W.P.(C) 3082/2014, W.P.(C) 3084/2014.
Mr. Apoorv Kurup, Ms. Nidhi Mittal and Ms. Aparna Arun, Advocates, for R-1/UGC in W.P.(C) 3082/2014.
Mr. Anil Soni, Standing Counsel with Mr. Devvrat Yadav, Advocates, for AICTE in W.P.(C) 3082/2014, W.P.(C) 3084/2014 and W.P.(C) 7408/2014 & C.M. 17598/2014.
Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj and Mr. Akhil Sharma, Advocates, for R-3 in W.P.(C) 3082/2014, W.P.(C) 3084/2014 and W.P.(C) 7408/2014 & C.M. 17598/2014.
Mr. Ripu Bharadwaj, CGSC, for R-4 UOI in W.P.(C) 3082/2014, W.P.(C) 3084/2014.
Mr. Rajinder Dhawan and Mr. B.S. Rana, Advocates, for R-3 in W.P.(C) 3084/2014.
Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Mr. Pooja Tandon and Ms. Nikita Sharma, Advocates, for the Petitioner in W.P.(C) 7408/2014 & C.M. 17598/2014.
Mr. Saurabh Kaushik, Advocate, for Mr. R.S. Raju, Advocate for R-1/UGC in W.P.(C) 7408/2014 & C.M. 17598/2014.
Mr. Pritish Sabharwal, Standing Counsel with Mr. Sharad Pandey, Advocates, for R-5/JMI in W.P.(C) 7408/2014 & C.M. 17598/2014.
Mr. Mukul Singh, CGSC, for UOI in W.P.(C) 7408/2014 & C.M. 17598/2014.
Mr. Rajinder Dhawan and Mr. B.S. Rana, Advocates, for R-3 in W.P.(C) 7408/2014 & C.M. 17598/2014.
Mr. Mukul Singh, CGSC, for the Respondent in W.P.(C) 7408/2014 & C.M. 17598/2014.

JUDGMENT

Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, J. (Oral)

1. This batch of writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India involves a similar issue, therefore, the same is being decided by a common order. For the sake of convenience, the facts are taken from W.P.(C) 3082/2014. However, wherever necessary, the facts and grounds from individual matters are also referred to.

2. The petitioners have challenged Clause 3 (vi) of the notification of the University Grants Commission-National Eligibility Test, June, 2012 (in short, UGC-NET examination, June 2012), imposed by respondent No.1- University Grants Commission (in short, UGC) to the extent it requires the candidates to compulsorily hold a Master's degree or equivalence by the Association of Indian Universities (in short, AIU), for appearing in the said examination.

3. The petitioners in W.P.(C) 3082/2014 have undergone a Post Graduate Diploma in Management (PGDM)/Post Graduate Diploma in Business Management (PGDBM) courses from the respective institutions which are recognized by All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), between the years 2002 to 2009.

4. In the year 2012, UGC invited applications for UGC-NET ex

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top