JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)

1. Present petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 23.08.2023, which reads as under:

"23.08.2022

Present: Sh. Shiv Kumar, Ld. Substitute Addl. P.P. for the State.

Sh. Harish, Ld. Counsel for all accused. All accused present on bail.

Framing of charge conceded.

After going through the contents of the chargesheet and the documents annexed therewith, grounds exist to proceed against the accused persons (1) Sachin Basoya and (2) Yogesh Basoya for offences under sections 308/34 IPC. Another charge framed against accused (3) Veer Singh for offense under section 307 IPC. Charges have been framed accordingly to which accused persons have pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. Put up for PE on 05.12.2022."

2. Mr.Varun Goswami, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that arguments on behalf of the accused persons were never heard as even reflected from the order-sheet and learned Additional Sessions Judge has framed the charges as having been conceded by learned counsel for the accused persons. Learned counsel submits that Mr.Harish, whose appearance has been marked for all the accused person were never representing his client.

3.