Ex. Ct/dvr Raj Singh vs Union of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Del) 904

SURESH KUMAR KAIT, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Ex. Ct/dvr Raj Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. A.K. Trivedi, Mr. Vaibha Trivedi & Mr. Naveen Kumar, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC with Mr. Hardik Bedi, Govt. Pleader for UOI.

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner is seeking following reliefs:

"a.) Quash and set aside the Impugned order dated 16/12/2022 declaring as unjust, arbitrary, discriminatory and against the judicial pronouncements on the subject;

b.) Direct Respondents the competent authority to Re-Consider the claim of the petitioner sympathetically and on humanitarian grounds under Rule-41 of CCS(Pension) Rules for grant compassionate allowances i.e. pension and gratuity wef from the date of his Dismissal from service i.e. 23/08/2003 in view of the Judicial pronouncements on the subject and the petitioner may be entitled for his pension and gratuity with arrears;

c.) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other writ/directions/orders as may be deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case;

d.) Award cost."

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the Prayer B made in the present petition, the present petition may be treated as a representation.

3. Accordingly, in view of the Prayer B made in the present petition, we hereby dispose of the present petition directing the respondents to treat the present petition as a representation and take a final dec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document