SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 904

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Neena Bansal Krishna, JJ.
Ex. Ct/dvr Raj Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 3500 of 2023
Decided On : 21-03-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. A.K. Trivedi, Mr. Vaibha Trivedi & Mr. Naveen Kumar, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC with Mr. Hardik Bedi, Govt. Pleader for UOI.

Headnote:

Pension Rules - Petition for Quashing Impugned Order - Court directs respondents to treat petition as representation and take final decision within eight weeks

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought to quash an order declaring as unjust and arbitrary and requested the competent authority to re-consider the claim for compassionate allowances under Pension Rules.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the respondents to treat the petition as a representation and make a final decision within eight weeks, communicating the decision to the petitioner with a reasoned order.

Issues: Quashing of impugned order, re-consideration of claim for compassionate allowances, writ of Mandamus

Ratio Decidendi: The court found it appropriate to dispose of the petition by directing the respondents to treat it as a representation and make a final decision within a specified timeframe.

Final Decision: The present petition was disposed of with the direction to the respondents to treat it as a representation and take a final decision within eight weeks.

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner is seeking following reliefs:

    "a.) Quash and set aside the Impugned order dated 16/12/2022 declaring as unjust, arbitrary, discriminatory and against the judicial pronouncements on the subject;

    b.) Direct Respondents the competent authority to Re-Consider the claim of the petitioner sympathetically and on humanitarian grounds under Rule-41 of CCS(Pension) Rules for grant compassionate allowances i.e. pension and gratuity wef from the date of his Dismissal from service i.e. 23/08/2003 in view of the Judicial pronouncements on the subject and the petitioner may be entitled for his pension and gratuity with arrears;

    c.) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other writ/directions/orders as may be deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case;

    d.) Award cost."

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the Prayer B made in the present petition, the present petition may be treated as a representation.

3. Accordingly, in view of the Prayer B made in the present petition, we hereby dispose of the present petition directing the respondents to treat the present petition as a representation and take a final decision on the same within eight weeks from today.

4. The decision, so taken, shall be communicated to the petitioner with a reasoned order within one week thereafter.

5. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top