SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
Shri Chand – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. disposition of petition and acknowledgment of petitioner's rights. (Para 1 , 2 , 8)
2. petitioner's claim for compassionate allowance and terminal dues. (Para 3 , 4)
3. respondent's obligation to decide representation. (Para 5)
4. court's directive on decision timeframe and petitioner's recourse. (Para 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT(Oral)

CM APPL.13356/2022

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

2. Application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 4479/2022

3. Present petition has been preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking directions to respondent no.2 to grant compassionate allowance at 2/3rd of pension and gratuity on last drawn pay of the petitioner with effect from 18.12.2008. Further seeks direction to pay the admissible terminal dues and arrears with interest @ 18% p.a. from 18.12.2008 till date of actual payment on compassionate allowance and admissible terminal dues.

4. The case of the petitioner is that he made representation dated 18.01.2022 to the respondent, however, till date, said representation has not been decided.

5. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that representation dated 18.01.2022 shall be decided within eight weeks, if n

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top