SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 927

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Neena Bansal Krishna, JJ.
Lokesh Kumar Arya – Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 6360 of 2021
Decided On : 23-03-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Ankur Chhibber & Mr. Nikunj Arora, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC, for the UOI.

The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the extension of pension scheme benefits in accordance with relevant rules and previous judgments.

Headnote:

Writ of Mandamus - Pension Scheme - The court directed the respondents to extend the benefit of the old pension scheme to the petitioner in accordance with relevant rules and previous judgments.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought a Writ of Mandamus to extend the benefit of the old pension scheme in accordance with specific notifications and rules.

Finding of the Court:

The court disposed of the petition, directing the respondents to decide the case of the petitioner within two months and extend the benefits in line with a previous judgment, if the petitioner is eligible.

Issues: The issue raised in the present petition was the extension of the old pension scheme benefits to the petitioner.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the judgment in Pawan Kumar And Ors. vs. Union of India And Ors., which covered the same issue.

Final Decision: The present petition was disposed of, with the direction for the respondents to decide the petitioner's case within two months and extend the benefits in line with the relevant judgment, if eligible.

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner is seeking following relief:

    "a.) Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to extend the benefit of old pension scheme to the Petitioner in terms of the Notification dated 22.12.2003, MHA letter dated 06.08.2004 and in accordance with CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 by treating him as members of an Armed Force of the Union of India as held in case of Cr. Appeal No. 439/1980 titled as Akhilesh Prasad v Union Territory of Mizoram and other judgments passed by the Apex Court as well as this Hon'ble Court also to grant the same benefit as is being given to the Army, Navy and Air Force."

2. Learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner submits that the issue raised in the present petition is squarely covered by the judgement rendered by this Court in Pawan Kumar And Ors. vs. Union of India And Ors., W.P. (C) 12712/2021 decided on 11.01.2023.

3. Accordingly, we hereby dispose of the present petition directing the respondents to decide the case of the petitioner within two months and extend the benefits thereof on the lines of the aforementioned judgment, if he is otherwise eligible.

4. The present petition is disposed of.

5. Needless to state that if the petitioner is still aggrieved by the decision of the respondents, he may challenge the same before the appropriate forum.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top