SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 1369

SURESH KUMAR KAIT, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Nasir Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr.Mananyay Mishra & Mr.Bhaskar Pandey, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Ms.Anju Gupta & Mr.Roshan Lal Goel, Advocates, for the UOI. Sh. Hemendra Singh, Deputy Commandant (Law) BSF.

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. Vide the present petition, petitioner prays as under:

    a. To treat the petitioners as the members of the Old Pension Scheme, and extend the pension benefits as per the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972;

    b. To grant the benefits of the Old pension Scheme, in accordance with Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972;

    c. To declare that the New Pension Scheme notification dated 22.12.2003 is discriminatory.

2. The issue raised in the present petition has already been decided by this Court in W.P.(C) No.12712/2021 titled as "Pawan Kumar & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors." and batch decided on 11.01.2023, therefore, no further order is required to be passed in the present petition.

3. In view of above, petition is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top